Columbia Bank reviews

2.8

33% would recommend to a friend

(965 total reviews)
avatar

Clint Stein

30% approve of CEO

28% positive business outlook

Columbia Bank has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 965 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Columbia Bank employee rating is 25% below average for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

965 reviews
3.0
Oct 5, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Columbia Bank provides good job stability, a conservative culture, and reasonable benefits. The company also emphasizes work/family balance and is flexible in providing time off. Since it is a bank, employees get all the bank holidays off, as well as a floating day for their birthday. Management does not micro-manage and most departmental and branch managers seem to have a pretty laid back approach. Internet and email use, while monitored, is largely unfettered. Fellow employees are mostly happy, laid-back people. The company is willing to pay for some education, as long as the employee commits to a minimum number of additional months or years at the bank.

Cons

Compensation is below market, as has been shown in a recent employee survey and in my own experience. The company is resistant to change and grows slowly; as a result, there is little opportunity for advancement. The resistance to change shows up in lots of little ways: senior management does not seek out employee input and largely ignores it when received; managers often "pass the buck" for problems not in their direct area of oversight; ineffective ways of doing things are held on to because that's the way they've always been done. Also, careerists tend to be less than ambitious, and there are more than a few lazy types spread throughout.

1.0
Mar 8, 2026

Where ‘Culture’ Is a Slogan, Not a Reality

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people working at the team level are the only consistent bright spot. Many colleagues are hardworking, capable and genuinely supportive of one another. Day-to-day collaboration with peers is often the only thing that keeps morale from completely collapsing.

Cons

The problems here are systemic and start at the top of the organization. Leadership frequently talks about “culture,” “values,” and “putting employees first,” but the day-to-day reality for associates looks nothing like those messages. The culture is dictated from above rather than built through trust and respect, which makes most of the messaging feel performative rather than genuine. Planning and execution are chronically reactive. Projects are often rushed with little foresight or coordination, creating constant fire drills and unnecessary stress. Instead of strategic planning, many teams operate in a cycle of last-minute urgency that burns people out and leads to avoidable mistakes. Communication from senior leadership is inconsistent and often contradictory. Priorities shift frequently, and employees are left trying to interpret what direction the organization is actually moving in. There is also a strong perception of favoritism and uneven standards, where visibility and relationships matter more than performance. Compensation and benefits are disappointing given the scale and profitability of the institution. At the same time, employees regularly see resources spent on initiatives that appear designed more for optics than for improving the employee experience. The contrast between those priorities and the daily reality for associates is hard to ignore. For an organization that now operates at the scale of a $70B bank, many internal practices still resemble those of a much smaller institution—just with more layers of bureaucracy and politics. Growth in size has not been matched by growth in leadership maturity or organizational discipline. Recent integrations have also been difficult to watch. Many new colleagues joining the organization deserved a stronger, more stable culture than what currently exists.

1.0
Oct 22, 2025

Toxic culture and poor leadership

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Growth oriented and entrepreneurial prior to Columbia acquisition

Cons

Bureaucratic, not customer focused, extremely political and tolerating/condoning bad behaviors permeating from poor leadership that is self centered and self-absorbed

Viewing 91 - 93 of 965 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,000 Columbia Bank reviews submitted anonymously by Columbia Bank employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Columbia Bank is right for you.