Confluent reviews

3.6

65% would recommend to a friend

(707 total reviews)
avatar

Jay Kreps

75% approve of CEO

51% positive business outlook

Confluent has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 707 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Confluent employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

707 reviews
3.0
Oct 2, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

(1) Lots of complex problems and opportunities; (2) Fast-growing, so there's a lot to gain from being here. (3) Great for career development perspective on a resume.

Cons

Your job experience depends mostly on your direct manager. I left after a short period of time. (1) Culture. Culture. Culture. Mid-management expects you to follow their instructions on any technical specs and not deviate from it even if it's potentially solved in a better way. Feedback isn't transparent and instead, employees are terrified of communicating to managers what's wrong and where they need help. My relationship with my manager was combative from day one: whether it was rhetorical questions like "do you know what X metric means?" in order to tease out if I understood a technical concept tested during the interview, or the manager's tendency to associate minor formatting issues of a presentation or chart as a proxy for technical competency (when communication issues were rife), this place needs a shake up.

1.0
Feb 25, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people in some regions, not so in others.

Cons

Poor to non existent culture, secretive, scared employees unwilling to talk to you, this is not a nice place to work. Very weird, inexperienced middle management types who you can tell have never managed staff before. Adversarial fear based culture.

avatar
Confluent Response
6y
Posted on behalf: I appreciate you taking the time to share feedback. I am disappointed to learn that your experience at Confluent was not a positive one. We have also made significant time and monetary investments in enablement, all with the goal of helping both our managers and individual contributors succeed in their roles while also developing in their careers. However, I would concur that we have a real opportunity to further invest in and enable our managers, particularly given our rapid rate of growth over the last five years. I’m happy to share that your feedback on management is not only heard but actively being implemented. We’ve recently hired a new leader of Enablement and GTM Performance and our People & Talent team are closing on the first-ever leader of Learning & Development. With respect to your feedback on culture, your comments are surprising and not issues I’ve personally experienced, heard directly, observed in our Employee Engagement survey nor on forums such as Glassdoor. That said, I’d earnestly like to learn more about your experience, particularly given our strong culture based upon mission, values, and team. Please reach out if you’re open to discussing your experience so we can do better in the future. Best, Roger Scott, Chief Customer Officer
1.0
Dec 7, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Commitment to remote-first. * Nearly everything prior to 2021 and a lot of good through mid-2022, but it seems the powers-that-be were working hard to eliminate everything good by early 2023, so it's hard to list. Had I written this prior to then, the "pros" list would have dominated and I might have had a hard time listing anything in "cons," but I am not reviewing that company that effectively ceased to exist as it was. * Earnings we made prior to 2023 and were able to save.

Cons

* The formerly-awesome culture started to shift around the time of the IPO, was bad by mid-2022, and was entirely destroyed by the end of January 2023. Nearly everything negative I am about to write did not apply before this and I would have never expected from the company and I team I loved working for before 2022. What was once a great place to work became toxic. * Way too much middle management and HR has been added - made-up things with meaningless responsibilities like "strategy and operations," and way too many managers who didn't and couldn't do anything of value were added, while skilled, technical positions were de-prioritized and weren't filled when vacated. Toxic authoritarians who can't do anything technical compensate for their lack of skills by asserting power over the skilled. * A significant increase in absolutely useless busywork (coinciding with the increase of way too much middle management). This was coupled with (1) poor user interfaces for useless busywork (2) being scolded by management who couldn't do anything useful if you didn't drop doing your real job immediately to do busywork (3) being scolded by the same management for not doing useless busywork during PTO. * A culture that does not recognize nor reward employees for working long and odd hours but instead emphasizes busywork created by middle management. * A serious failure to promote from within and respect the people who helped build Confluent, and instead bring in outsiders who know nothing about the company before 2021. * Professional Services and Education was essentially destroyed by a failure to promote from within and the hiring of an outside VP in 2022, following by hiring his useless friend for a made-up position is useless. Both people took a team that used to be filled with joyful, caring people who once enjoyed even socializing with one another and sucked the fun out of it. Both were extremely toxic, cold, mean individuals who treated team members like dirt. While it was never confirmed the two events were linked, these two individuals' rise to power and a mass exodus of several big names in PS happened too closely together for it to have just been coincidental. * A total 180 from having been a company that offered things to support for open-source Apache Kafka to an emphasis on Confluent Cloud only, to the point of management essentially saying core Apache Kafka didn't matter. * A de-emphasis on technical matters and on people. Probably the worst thing that happened was when all-hands meetings went from Zoom meetings where employees could see each other to to "webinars" that are essentially TV shows where the important people flaunt how important they are. All-hands meetings by 2022 almost never talk about anything technical (or Kafka), and instead are dominated by business jargon. It seems like of the few special people who get to be on the all-hands TV show, it would be surprising if 20% of them could pass the first exam of a first-semester programming course., which is really sad for a tech company. * A continued removal of perks and benefits. Perks aren't essential, but cutting them and not increasing compensation is cold. Someone decided that cutting home Internet reimbursement around the time the whole company went remote was a good idea? No, that's cold. Then other things started slowly trickling away and joke raises lower than inflation rates were all we got.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 707 Reviews

Glassdoor has 761 Confluent reviews submitted anonymously by Confluent employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Confluent is right for you.