employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Creative Assembly

Is this your company?

Creative Assembly reviews

3.2

54% would recommend to a friend

(210 total reviews)

Gareth Edmondson

51% approve of CEO

38% positive business outlook

Creative Assembly has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 210 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Creative Assembly employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

210 reviews
3.0
Apr 6, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Most people are nice and chill, and there are good communities for sports and games . You get to work on nice IPs. The benefits are ok, especially bupa, bupa dental and pension up to 6%. CA tries to care for the wellfare of their employees. Career progression is somewhat clear, at least for programmers.

Cons

At the moment CA is suffering a financial and identity crisis due to years of bad decisions from management. Nowadays many studio updates talk about "change" without anything concrete being proposed, while every few months new layoffs are announced. There are some toxic people and some people who are terrible at their job but they are just there because nobody kicked them out back in the days and now it's like ~10 years that they are there and have fossilized into CA. SEGA being a japanese company, we have to follow japanese market rules. This means every time management starts working on layoffs they can't tell us until it's announced to the japanese market. This will never change until rules in japan change or SEGA sells CA to another company but every time we get the heartbreaking email of apologies from the various CEOs which to be honest add insult to injury. Salaries are Horsham salaries.

3.0
Apr 8, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly and open culture, good games, nice place to start in the industry

Cons

Outdated technology resulting in time wasting and inefficiency, any improvements inside take forever, people afraid of making decisions, a lot of talking and discussions that don't follow up with anything, high turnover of talent, low salaries in an expensive area to live in

2.0
Jun 14, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Overall dream company to work for as a neurotypical, making effort to be a great employer for the average employee. Various social events and company benefits. Variable work environment dependant on project and department. Whilst there are almost always problems, some projects have been overall pleasant to work on.

Cons

QA department in particular is fairly toxic, a mess of aging work philosophy that lacks objective understanding and a game of old boy club politics - directive in its management with sanity/productivity lost providing data that is too variable and fabricated to be of justifiable practicality (but im sure it *looks* 'impressive' further up the ladder where no one really knows the context). Communication and work processes take the lowest priority for leadership (unless they involve gathering data) and so are never properly developed, creating a stressful environment to work in. Post mortems are primarily a formality in which it is always 'too early' or 'too late' in further projects to adapt solutions from. Efforts are made in terms of Diversity & Inclusion, and whilst I feel grateful to even have a voice, I cannot help but feel it more a pacifier than an active effort. Most time is spent *talking* about being inclusive but very little is spent on *listening* and *understanding* to what being inclusive actually means, let alone objectively driven action towards such ends. The QA department is particularly averse to neurodiverse needs, given its low prioritization of effective communication and poorly planned/designed extraneous work processes. Reasonable adjustments are attempted but not made practical or realistic enough to be maintained, often being abandoned and forgotten about. There is also little drive to understand the reasonable adjustments, utilising an interpretation of them that benefits hr/leadership rather than the goal they were set out to achieve. Career advancement is largely based on playing the social/data manipulation game as there is a distinct lack of objectivity amongst senior leadership which has shaped the departments culture. There is no room for flexible delegation within its rigidly hierarchical structure and thus no room is given for neurodiverse strengths to shine through and gain recognition, unless able to display neurotypical strengths whilst working under conditions that are directly hostile to neurodiverse needs. If there are communication problems due to autistic differences, it is made sure that you understand it is your fault and your fault alone. As such, problems with anxiety and general mental wellbeing are likely to develop... Overall, as an autistic individual who first started enthusiastically learning everything he could at every spare moment - from our tools, to scripting, to coding in C++. I feel that enthusiasm and passion has been crushed by my experience. I no longer dedicate my personal time to career advancement and instead just try to survive until I can pursue another lifepath in my more focused passion for UX and Accessibility - fields which I now feel I only stand a chance of gaining recognition for through self-employment the way autistic entrepreneurs have like Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and Elon Musk.

Viewing 22 - 24 of 210 Reviews

Glassdoor has 220 Creative Assembly reviews submitted anonymously by Creative Assembly employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Creative Assembly is right for you.