Curia reviews

3.0

48% would recommend to a friend

(712 total reviews)
avatar

Philip Macnabb

49% approve of CEO

32% positive business outlook

Curia has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 712 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Curia employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

712 reviews
1.0
Feb 3, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people you work directly with are mostly really great. It can be a nice work environment up until you realize all those nice and hardworking people are being taken advantage of.

Cons

- You will be expected to work 9 hours while only being paid for 8 - If your chemistry runs long you must stay late or come in on weekends - They offer you a very low salary when you initially apply just so they can continue to low ball you with their final offer (ask for more money always) - Benefits get cut every year - Their maximum raise is 2.5% and that's a merit based raise that will only be given to a couple people every year - You will be given more than you can handle because people are always quitting and there isn't enough staff (this is a big issue for Chemical Development) This used to be a great company with benefits, bonuses and adequate raises but that time has passed. I was really excited to start working here because a current employee had told me it was great and to apply (they get money for recommending people) but within 4 months I started looking for a new job. Do yourself a favor and apply to regeneron.

avatar
Curia Response
4y
Thank you for your feedback. It is important to us to hear from all team members, past and present, to implement future change. We try to look at industry standards and cost of living for our employees in relation to other benefits offered by Curia for team members. We do appreciate you taking the time to share your experience with us, and bringing your concerns to our attention.
1.0
May 7, 2018

Research Scientist

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A good stepping off point for anyone wanting to build a career. They'll train you well, but don't stay too long. Good experience in a cGMP environment.

Cons

Company has spread itself too thin with mulitple company aquisitions and no longer can seem to focus on its individual departments. This ultimately has stalled improvement at the department level. There is little to no expectation from upper management for departments to support one-another. The company has very lofty goals and is excited when these monetary goals are met, however the company continues to slash budgets and avoids using increased revenue to fund CAPEX needs or even give employees higher wages. On paper, AMRI pays its employees a living wage. But it is just livable. Most employees live pay-check to paycheck. The company offers "performance-based salary/wage increases," however, these increases are a pittance that only just covers increasing inflation rates - typically no more than a 3% increase of your current salary. This year however, the company broke with its tradition to supply a wage increase disguised as a performance bonus, because the company failed to meet its overall goal. Overall the company is horribly understaffed with very few seasoned and skilled employees. Most employees come into AMRI, learn what they can and leave when they realize there are no career prospects. The upper management is by no means out of touch or unaware of the needs of people in the labs. I've heard many town halls and company wide meetings where employee needs and issues in the labs have been brought up, upper management (the CEO and otherwise) consistently dismiss and downplay these issues and never act on them. There is an unwritten rule that employees are expected to work more than 40+ hours per week, even though most full time employees are salaried at 40 hours. Many senior level scientists are expected to work 60 - 80 hours per week (without bonus pay or overtime) for the sole purpose of meeting unrealistic deadlines. Typically the company does not show appreciation for this level of work but instead is critical of it by positing that these employees aren't managing their time well enough... The company has a very deep problem with sexism in the work place. I've heard many upper level scientists creating very clear examples of sexual harrassment. Complaints never seem to be handled.

1.0
Jun 16, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Can't think of much...They have a lot of friendly people working at the site.

Cons

Extremely weak leadership at Burlington from MFG through QA Low pay and No Bonuses Can't keep a PM longer than 6-12 months Quality systems are severely lacking All of the knowledgeable people are leaving or have left Company is heading back into a warning letter or consent decree

Viewing 7 - 9 of 712 Reviews

Glassdoor has 765 Curia reviews submitted anonymously by Curia employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Curia is right for you.