employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Dev Technology Group

Is this your company?

Dev Technology Group Software Engineer reviews

2.6

1% would recommend to a friend

(8 total reviews)
avatar

Kendall Holbrook

22% approve of CEO

13% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

8 reviews
3.0
Feb 27, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good Working Cullter To Work

Cons

Have to work hard ever day

avatar
Dev Technology Group Response
11mo
Thanks for the review, however, I think you worked for a different Dev Technology as we do not hire outside of the U.S. due to the nature of our work. It appears you are in Sri Lanka. Our company has been mistaken as others in the past as there are multiple "Dev Techs" in the U.S.
3.0
Dec 16, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Primarily collegial, small company environment, niche expertise in a few key accounts

Cons

None that I can think of except limited contract opportunities

avatar
Dev Technology Group Response
2y
Thank you for taking time to share your feedback via Glassdoor. Being at a small company has positives and negatives. The positives are all of the pros you mentioned which is the culture that we are proud of, while the negatives is the smaller portfolio of contracts that we have. If you are looking for a new opportunity, I encourage you to share that with your manager and the HR team (or DevNav), so that we can help you navigate the company and look for other opportunities. We are always hiring into new projects or positions, so despite our size, there are opportunities that employees may not be aware are there. ~Kendall, CEO
3.0
Jan 4, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent work life balance Average industry pay (nothing amazing) Instant retirement vesting Great culture Great people Good senior leadership New Unlimited PTO plan (good or bad depending on your role) Great for middle-late age professional or those with kids.

Cons

Limited potential for young developers Low contract win rate for a small-mid company. Casting a wide net vs going after contracts they know they can win. Lowest bidder style contracts Contracts can be impactful or meaningless revenue streams and you don’t have much choice. Outdated tech (typical government) Hit or miss clients Lack of tech leads and tech evangelists Product team is also engineering mangers People stuck in same positions without advancement for years No patent work or process to encourage it

avatar
Dev Technology Group Response
5y
Dev Team Member, Thank you for your response. I am hopeful you are sharing these suggestions and opinions not only on Glassdoor but through our open door policy. During orientation, I share our open door policy and my personal commitment to every employee to be a resource to them. Not only do I say it, I provide contact information for myself and every member of the leadership team. Based on your comments, I am fairly confident that you are a relatively new employee, but more importantly, I am 100% concerned about your experience with Dev and wonder how I might be able to help you now that your concerns have reached me. However, to help, you will need to reach out to me directly. In an effort to address some of your concerns, here goes. I, as the CEO, own our Growth Strategy and am involved in every bid/ no bid decision. We do not bid widely, we bid strategically and our win rate is above industry average (for government IT services companies). I'm happy to walk through the process and the data including the bid rate and win rate statistics if you would like to discuss. In terms of our organizational structure we do not have "products" so we do not have "product managers" instead, we have Project and Program Managers since we offer IT services customized to our clients needs. In many cases our team structure is required to align to our client requirements for the team as specified in the Request for Proposal (if you would like, I'm happy to walk through one of those with you as well). However, I do agree that we should have a clear technical lead on each project, if that is not happening on your project we should remedy that. In terms of innovation, patents do not often define innovation in the government services contracting space which is where we align. For our clients, innovation is about finding new and better ways to implement for the government. The government owns what they buy, so anything we develop for the government is owned by them. While we can offer process innovation and solutions that can be applied to their requirements, their requirements drive the work, so we have to meet them where they are. If we wanted to be a more product centered company, I agree that patents would be appropriate, but we are not playing in the product space. Finally, I'd like to address the title of your post, "not for young professionals". It is true, we have not historically had many positions for those professionals within 5 years of college graduation, but over the past few years that has drastically changed. So much so, that two years ago we launched a group for those early in their careers within the company that is sponsored by me and funded. The DENizens are self organizing with all Dev employees 30 and under as members. They plan both professional and social programs and events. The reach out to every employee in that demographic, but it is up to each employee to engage with them. We are not perfect, but we are attempting to have our "DENizens" help us continue to mature as a company that is a great place to work for all of our current and future employees. I'd love an opportunity to talk to you and work through your areas of concern and give you some context about the business you recently joined. Please reach out to me, I'm on Teams all day and you have my phone numbers and email. Sincerely, Kendall
Viewing 4 - 6 of 8 Reviews

Glassdoor has 68 Dev Technology Group reviews submitted anonymously by Dev Technology Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Dev Technology Group is right for you.