Draper reviews

4.1

90% would recommend to a friend

(386 total reviews)
avatar

Jerry Wohletz

94% approve of CEO

74% positive business outlook

Draper has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 386 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Draper employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

386 reviews
3.0
Feb 12, 2017

Benefits = Top Notch, Upper Mgmt mixed bag

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I work in the Finance & Administration Division. New President is a breath of fresh air, shaking things up, but sometimes has unrealistic expectations. The company has created some amazing technology and solutions. New updates in building are great! The benefits are top notch!

Cons

The CFO is an ice queen and her management style is intimidation. HR is a mess. Change is slow among employees that have been there a long time.

1.0
Jan 14, 2017

Clueless leadership

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great committed tech staff, top notch aerospace engineering.

Cons

New CEO is making changes without much strategy. Does not seem to listen. Spending money and energy on pointless TV commercials and strange building projects.

4.0
Dec 22, 2016

Great benefits, but little room for your career or salary to grow

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have learned more here than I have at any other job. The relocation package is amazing, as are most other core benefits. There are brilliant people working here. Draper is involved in so many fields you will work with rocket scientists, psychologists, computer scientists, biologists... In the beginning I attended 1 training and conference a year (but 0 last year.) Extremely flexible hours and work life balance. Every employee had an office, almost all with a window, and the center of the buildings are labs. (This, however, is going away, see below.) R&D (since eliminated)

Cons

It feels like there is virtually no career growth potential. Here are the titles for engineers and the years of experience required to have that title: Member of technical staff (MTS) -- 0 years MTS2 -- 2 years Senior MTS -- 5-15 Principle MTS -- 40 There are roughly 400 SMTSes and more every year. 10-15 people are made PMTS every year, but that includes people hired from outside the company, so maybe 5-8 per year are promoted from SMTS. Assuming the best, that 8 are promoted per year, that means on average it will take 25 years to be promoted. You basically need to be internationally known in your field to be promoted, as well as off the chart in every way imaginable, most of them having more to do with project management, business development and customer engagement than engineering, but most of all it is politics. You have to have the right powerful friends championing you or you don't stand a chance. It's great that they want PMTS to be prestigious, but just know that your career will almost certainly peak in your 30s and you won't be promoted again before you retire. Note: the rules may be different for MIT grads, which may explain why so many of them make a point of wearing their college rings as middle-aged engineers. Raises have been 1.5%-2.75%. Salaries are competitive with non-Cambridge and non-Boston-based companies, like MITRE and Lincoln Labs, but not with anything in the area. The hiring process is so slow that often by the time we give an offer the candidate has been relocated by another company and has been working for weeks or months. There are no fringe benefits like free coffee because it's a non-profit. All offices are being torn out and replaced with... I don't even know what to call it. It's like a cube farm, but worse. No cube walls, nothing to block sound, people talking all around you, taking phone calls, walking behind you while you try to concentrate. Basically Google did it, ergo it's the best thing ever so we must do it, despite the scientific consensus that it lowers productivity. When asked about employees who wouldn't be able to work in that environment, Ken Gabriel reportedly said that those are the people he wants to quit anyway. Draper had a low attrition rate (10% I think) but he indicated he is aiming for the industry norm of 25%, or 4 years (the 401k is fully vested in 5 years.)

Viewing 289 - 291 of 386 Reviews

Glassdoor has 517 Draper reviews submitted anonymously by Draper employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Draper is right for you.