employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Alcatel-Lucent

Acquired by Nokia

Is this your company?

Alcatel doesn't appreciate its employees, leadership is non-existent - Software Test Engineer Alcatel-Lucent Employee Review

2.0
Dec 27, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The job is stable, there isn't much else that can be said about the company. Currently the attitude of executives in the Austin office seems to be "just be happy you have a job". But, if that's all they are going to aspire to be, it doesn't make for a good company morale.

Cons

Our company was purchased by ALU a few months ago, and it has been down hill since. Bonus package is not even close to fair. Currently the bonus package is based on so called "stretch goals". However, when we are working over forty hours a week to complete project work, there isn't much time left in the day to work on goals. If you spend time on goals, your bonus can be zeroed out, if the company doesn't meet its revenue goals. So, what's the point?

Explore other reviews about Alcatel-Lucent

5.0
Jan 12, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

ALU afforded me many opportunities and the pay was great.

Cons

I can't think of any

2.0
Jun 11, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The workers at Alcatel-Lucent, at least the former Lucent employees since I worked almost exclusively with these folks, were among some of the smartest and most conscientous I ever worked with. The people who tried really cared and carried the company.

Cons

Alcatel brought with it a lot of the classic characteristics of bad French management. ("Why make it simple when we can make it complex?") Lucent has all the characteristics of a former 100-year old monolpoly. Its management is full of managers who never had to be efficient or organized (since it was based on a "cost plus" revenue system while Ma Bell ran the US phone system). In fact, the more people it hired and the more it spent on useless ideas, the more money it made! It has horrible compensation systems for its management and salesforce (paying for sales, not for profits). The company is very badly organized and while some departments are working 60+ hour weeks, others are fairly useless and make it hard for the productive groups to get real, very needed work done. They promote rah-rah cheerleaders into management who have no clue how to manage except to support the people who suck up to them. There is no well-integrated strategy for the company, and this leads to scattershot efforts at doing anything to have a good quarter, even if it means robbing next quarter's sales and profits.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All