employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Arista Networks

Is this your company?

Job is good but frustrating and desperate environment lately - Anonymous employee Arista Networks Employee Review

3.0
May 6, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Love the work assignments, challenging and and you get to learn a lot. There is always more to learn. You have to be willing to put some effort. - Very smart people to work with who are at the same time very helpful - Other learning opportunities available like interviewing, mentoring, organizing events, etc. There is a plethora of activities you can participate in other than your daily work. - This is a great place to develop your technical and professional skills and prepare yourself for the outside world. Arista has a reputation in the market and everyone knows that Arista's employees are better than average people. You will never have a difficulty of finding a job outside because you have Arista's work experience. - From last 1 year Arista is spending a good amount of money on team lunches, picnics and weekly beer bash. - Peer performance review - Areview - This has both pros and cons but still better than traditional way of performance review. The good part about this is you get reviewed by a lot of people and you get good feedback and you get to know how people perceive you. Your performance review does not lie in the hands of one man - your manager.

Cons

- Low salary, even if you joined close to IPO. The stocks are not worth much. - Counter offers - A person with lesser experience interviewed somewhere else and showed the offer to Arista, the managers gave him a counter offer which is 25% more than his salary (his current salary is also higher than mine because I got options). This seems like we do not deserve a 20-25% hike even if we are more experienced and have been longer with Arista - the hike I get is close to 5% even though I am called a star performer. The reason that I am given is, "You have stocks" and the risk I took by joining before IPO at a lower salary counts as nothing. This is very frustrating. My friends with the same level of experience are joining elsewhere and are easily getting 30% more than my salary and close to 125k worth of RSUs. - Areview - This worked really well when the company was small, now half the people don't understand it. It is called a review by peers but it has actually become a review by managers. The managers literally come back and poke people questioning their rankings and in 50% of the cases end up affecting the person and get the ranking changed according to who they think is better. - People start sending emails for irrelevant things to increase their visibility when Areview is in progress which shows the desperation of the employees. I feel pity for those people because they are smart and contributing people but they are scared and nervous because someone has to be at the bottom of the list (even though everyone is above average) and that is what they dread.

avatar
Arista Networks Response
10y
> Areview - it is called a review by peers but it has actually become > a review by managers. The Arista management team has a responsibility to conduct comprehensive employee performance reviews, just like at any other company. This has always been the case --- you are right that at the end of the day, our process is "review by managers" . However, our process is also based upon the rank-list, which is generated from the rankings submitted by the peers. Rank-list generation is based on a tournament rating algorithm and does not involve any management judgement at all. The rank-list serves as the foundation for level assignment, tweaked as needed by the management team. Areview has worked like this from the very beginning. Thanks to Areview, we are able to gather far more information about an employee and take that into consideration in the review process. It is one of our core strengths. > This worked really well when the company was small, now > half the people don't understand it. ... The managers > literally come back and poke people questioning their rankings... Put your two statements together, and I hope you'll see that the purpose of having managers question rankings is to help out when employees don't understand Areview. We ask our managers to look for rank lists that don't make sense to them, and to please make sure the employee understands what we are asking them to do. If so, then the rank list stands. The employee should only change their submission if the employee decides that their original submission was based on misunderstanding. For example, we have had people submit rank lists upside down. Surely it's worth helping people to recognize and correct this sort of error? > in 50% of the cases end up affecting the person and get the ranking > changed according to who they think is better. I believe when managers ask questions about rank lists, they are either trying to help spot and correct mistakes and misunderstandings, or are trying to gather actionable feedback on behalf of the person being reviewed. I don't think our managers are trying to unduly influence rank lists, but you're right that if managers are doing this, it's wrong. If you are aware of specific cases, I'd appreciate it if you brought them to my attention. Thanks, -Ken Kenneth Duda CTO & SVP Software Arista Networks, Inc.

Explore other reviews about Arista Networks

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Extremely talented engineering team - Extremely challenging and rewarding projects - Very good total compensation and stock performance - Very little politics, focus is on engineering and delivering products

Cons

- Limited corporate/team events, team 'swag' etc.

4.0
Jul 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay is good. RSU is good.

Cons

Still operates like a startup. Instruction and responsibility can be unclear

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All