Toxic leadership and poor patient care overshadow cool coworkers - Labratory Assistant Atrium Health Employee Review

2.0
Apr 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Really the only good thing about this place is the fact that some of the fellow staff are really cool. Leadership is a complete nightmare; patient care is absolutely not a priority and that is across the board. The overall attitude from leadership and work environment it cultivates is extremely toxic. The pay is ok but yearly raises are very small and because leadership is so sorry you will likely have additional work continually piled on with no additional compensation. I would say the benefits have gotten better in the last year to cover more options as far as providers but getting help from HR with things life short term disability or anything of that nature is a nightmare and confusing because of how HR has been restructured.

Cons

Poor leadership is honestly the biggest issues, all the way from top to bottom. However, hr is also rather unhelpful and I only ever went to them regarding benefits and work accommodations. I would hate to see how they tried to resolve an issue involving multiple employes. I honestly wouldn't recommend this place to my worst enemy. If you are a sorry worker who isnt bothered by watching patients suffer due to poor care and poor protocol adherence this might be a good spot for you. However if you take your job serious and any of that would bother you I'd strongly suggest another company. Also, this is not a place that welcomes change and the catty, behind the back talking is in my opinion encouraged because leadership is so unprofessional and participates in that unprofessional behavior as well.

Explore other reviews about Atrium Health

5.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits, work life balance

Cons

have to use PTO for holidays

2.0
Jun 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Cons

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All