DO NOT WORK HERE - Anonymous employee Atrium Health Employee Review

1.0
May 17, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There really are no pros.

Cons

Benefits are horrible so they have this Live Well program where you can do different things to earn money to put into your HSA account. They can never keep enough nurses or other therapist they are always looking to hire people, turn over is ridiculous. They have a lot of travel nurses within the system because of the crazy turn over rate. They pretend to care about employees and patients, and pretend like they have morals and values, but of course their bottom line is money, they do anything they can to maximize profits, from hardly paying people to cutting positions. They have a monopoly in Charlotte and surrounding areas, so they can pay whatever they want, there isn't really any competition. Work life balance is a joke.

Explore other reviews about Atrium Health

5.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits, work life balance

Cons

have to use PTO for holidays

1
2.0
Jun 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Cons

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All