awful benefits but love my coworkers - Critical Care Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Nurse Atrium Health Employee Review

2.0
Apr 18, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Dickson Heart Unit is one of the best units I have ever worked on. I love my supervisors & my manager Janice. I love our patient population. I love how everyone is seen as an individual, as a human with a life, not just a body. I feel I am valued here. My coworkers are always eager to help. It is like a little family most of the time.

Cons

THE PAY & BENEFITS. Overall, administration/ management is poor. Gene Woods is a joke, SO out of touch. The health insurance is what really turns me off. The hospital owns the insurance company, which I am not sure how that is legal. It is so expensive if you have absolutely any medical problems. Input from nurses is not valued at the higher level. Pay is atrocious compared to anywhere else. Most people take this job as a stepping stone to CRNA school. It is not meant to be a lifer here. I have also faced discrimination here for not being straight or Christian. Staff is a lot of new grads/ lots of turnover due to the nature of the unit. I would work here if you have the passion for what it entails/ want to advance your career/ want a challenge because we see the sickest people in the area & NC.

Explore other reviews about Atrium Health

5.0
Feb 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great training and culture. There is continuing education throughout the year.

Cons

I had no cons for this job. I loved working here.

2.0
Jun 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Cons

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All