I loved my job - Registered Nurse Atrium Health Employee Review

3.0
Jun 5, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Patient and safety-centered, my manager and director worked hard to make sure we had what it took to provide the best care for our patients according to evidence-based-practice.

Cons

Staffing and scheduling was difficult for staff nurses on my unit. There was no guarantee for a day off, even for doctor's appointments scheduled months in advance or important life events. PTO was also not guaranteed, even for vacations booked a year in advance. Work-life balance was challenging. Managers and admins had a much more flexible schedule, but they also had to take more call and be available for longer hours. When I became sick, Atrium refused to offer me a job anywhere in the entire region that I could work within my limitations, even though I had been a long-time employee with an excellent track record. HR told me off the record that they did not follow their own policies for helping employees find other jobs within the system, which was true in my case.

Explore other reviews about Atrium Health

5.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits, work life balance

Cons

have to use PTO for holidays

1
2.0
Jun 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Cons

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All