Interesting Personalities - Structural Analysis Engineer II Boeing Employee Review

3.0
Sep 6, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The system in the company is setup to help employees succeed in the area of their employment by giving them good training, good experience, good projects and other things. Also the pay & benefits are okay for a single person living in the area. There is also some collective bargaining that help to get guaranteed raises & benefits.

Cons

Cost of living in the PNW is very high. So, the pay that seems good on paper is not enough for a person with family to live on. The system for moving out of groups that you may not like is combatsome. Getting promoted is also somewhat dependent on your management & it could take a long time, even after being qualified. The company could be a good & fun place to work, if you have good people on your team, but it could sap your motivations if you end up a team with an awful supervisors & teammates. The structural analysis (primary structures) group is very hierarchical & in the new program I'm in it seems like some of the personalities their only care about marginalizing others & not necessarily making sure they do what's best for the aircraft. Unfortunately, people with such personalities are getting empowered in the IPT I'm in.

Explore other reviews about Boeing

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work life balance for employees and management

Cons

Still assessing the company. So far so good.

2.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent work-life balance compared to many aerospace companies. Good benefits (healthcare, retirement, PTO).

Cons

- Five days per week in the office - Parking can be challenging. - Working across multiple time zones (U.S., Brazil, India) creates coordination overhead - Compensation is not competitive for the Seattle area. - Limited opportunities for meaningful career growth. While there are internal career paths, I haven't found many opportunities that align with the technical challenges and responsibilities I'm looking for - SPEEA's seniority-based structure can slow advancement for newer employees - Programs have very long development cycles, so it can take years to see your work become a finished product - Less exposure to cutting-edge technology than companies focused on emerging products (space, medical devices, AI hardware, quantum computing, etc. Significant bureaucracy and slow decision-making

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All