employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Caesars Entertainment

Is this your company?

Supportive peers but poor management oversight and growth - Director Caesars Entertainment Employee Review

2.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Peers and teammates are supportive of each other. For a digital organization, the pay was very good but I believe they've significantly reduced salaries. Some of the managers were very good.

Cons

The Caesars Digital team operated in a flat organization, where some GMs were trying to actively manage teams of 75-150 individuals. Career growth is almost non-existent as a result. C-suite management was non-existent and came from finance or hospitality backgrounds. Org success was purely tied to annual EBITDA and without understanding of how a digital/engineering organization should be run, resulting in disconnected employees (most of whom were remote), lack of scalable structure, and zero oversight.

Explore other reviews about Caesars Entertainment

5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company and opportunities to move up!

Cons

It is a lot of work but very worth it!

1.0
Feb 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with a decent team.

Cons

• Corporate HR consistently sides with management instead of truly advocating for team members. There is very little neutral investigation — it often feels predetermined. • The culture leans heavily toward corrective action instead of coaching and development. Instead of teaching managers how to lead and communicate effectively, discipline is the first tool used. • There is clear favoritism across departments. The same standards are not applied consistently, and certain individuals are protected regardless of performance. • Minorities are treated differently. Opportunities, visibility, and advancement do not feel equitable. • Benefits have been repeatedly changed over the years, often reducing value for employees. • Education reimbursement requirements were changed in ways that made it harder for team members to qualify. • Unlimited PTO was removed for Managers but kept for Directors and above. Instead of addressing misuse or coaching leaders on approving time appropriately, the benefit was taken away from one level while preserved for another. • Performance reviews and merit increases are discouraging. A 0–3% range, where 3% represents “exceeds expectations,” does not reward high performance in any meaningful way — especially in the current cost-of-living environment. • Frontline workers are underpaid given the revenue the company generates. The gap between executive compensation and frontline wages is significant. • Communication around policy changes lacks transparency and often feels reactive rather than people-centered. • Workloads continue to increase without corresponding support or staffing adjustments. • The company promotes a “family” culture and slogans like “Together We Win,” but many team members feel like replaceable numbers tied to financial performance. The gap between messaging and lived experience is glaring. “Together We Win” feels more like a tagline than a value.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All