employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Caesars Entertainment

Is this your company?

Fun, challenging, but stressful work environment. - Anonymous employee Caesars Entertainment Employee Review

3.0
May 24, 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

For the first few months or year, one would definitely enjoy working there as he is faced with a totally different world, the casinos' world, people that sleep during the day and work at night. Nevertheless, croupiers and casino staff are slightly different than most people one meets and they all fully integrate in the company's culture, which can be defined as the distinctive feature of the organization.

Cons

On the other hand, having a different lifestyle, destroys your work-life balance as your social life tends to be non-existent. Also, working as a croupier tends to be extremely stressful as you have to deal with loads of very difficult customers. Moreover, the promotion opportunities in certain areas of the company are either not given or extremely hard to get, which, together with other factors, such as tiredness or difficult customers, can make the work within the company quite frustrating.

Explore other reviews about Caesars Entertainment

5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company and opportunities to move up!

Cons

It is a lot of work but very worth it!

2.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Peers and teammates are supportive of each other. For a digital organization, the pay was very good but I believe they've significantly reduced salaries. Some of the managers were very good.

Cons

The Caesars Digital team operated in a flat organization, where some GMs were trying to actively manage teams of 75-150 individuals. Career growth is almost non-existent as a result. C-suite management was non-existent and came from finance or hospitality backgrounds. Org success was purely tied to annual EBITDA and without understanding of how a digital/engineering organization should be run, resulting in disconnected employees (most of whom were remote), lack of scalable structure, and zero oversight.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All