Transparent and supportive team - Program Manager Cloud Odyssey Employee Review

5.0
Jun 11, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The best part I like about Cody (Cloud Odyssey) is that the org is a friendly, transparent and supportive team. From the management to managers to employees are down-to-earth team members who have vision to be successful in life. Management team have been working in other orgs just like us and have the inner desire to create ambience that is missing in their previous org. Work culture here is: Work as though you are working for your own org and bring the best in you. Your manager encourages you with your own thoughts and be responsible for it. There is plenty of options to grow and explore in various ways in this org. Our org is flexible with WFH or WFO hybrid options.

Cons

Cody (Cloud Odyssey) is a start up and so there may be gaps in the policy but I find it here that standards are high when compared to our peers. The policy and work culture are far superior than the best in org. This org is open to feedback and is quick to adapt for the betterment of the team.

Explore other reviews about Cloud Odyssey

5.0
Jul 21, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work Environment is very Good

Cons

Need to Explore More Clients

2.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Recruitment Assistant Manager has been extremely supportive and helpful. Without her guidance, I cannot imagine how I would have achieved my goals and survived. The SFMC, SFCC, Mulesoft, and Sales teams have also been very supportive. Whenever there were requirements or challenges, they were always willing to step in, assist, and help drive closure effectively. Overall, my experience working with both my manager and the team has been very positive and collaborative.

Cons

*PF (Provident Fund) contributions were not credited on a regular monthly basis. Typically, updates were shared every 2–3 months, but there was a significant delay of around 10–12 months, which needs attention. *Employee engagement activities are not managed effectively and require improvement. *As the company is service-based, requirements often move slowly and may suddenly go on hold or get dropped. *Observed that communication skills and internal references sometimes influence selection decisions more than other factors. *Candidates with management or employee referrals tend to have higher chances of selection and expectation fulfillment. *Referrals are valuable, but candidates should be considered only if they meet job requirements and clear interviews with good communication skills. Recruitment team involvement appears limited; there is a perception of reduced voice or influence in hiring decisions which I have noticed

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All