On-Site Opportunity to London - Salesforce Architect Cloud Odyssey Employee Review

5.0
Jun 20, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Got a permanent on-site opportunity to London in 2 years of the Journey with Cloud Odyssey. The role offers direct engagement with large enterprise clients across various industries, allowing for meaningful conversations around digital transformation, platform strategy, and architectural best practices. Being on-site provides valuable exposure to Salesforce leadership and client executives. Have a chance to attend Global events and the latest innovations like Agentforce. The company is sponsoring a business visa to visit Europe as well.

Cons

Project demands and timelines can test your resilience; you need to be adaptive & strong at time management.

Explore other reviews about Cloud Odyssey

5.0
Jul 21, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work Environment is very Good

Cons

Need to Explore More Clients

2.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Recruitment Assistant Manager has been extremely supportive and helpful. Without her guidance, I cannot imagine how I would have achieved my goals and survived. The SFMC, SFCC, Mulesoft, and Sales teams have also been very supportive. Whenever there were requirements or challenges, they were always willing to step in, assist, and help drive closure effectively. Overall, my experience working with both my manager and the team has been very positive and collaborative.

Cons

*PF (Provident Fund) contributions were not credited on a regular monthly basis. Typically, updates were shared every 2–3 months, but there was a significant delay of around 10–12 months, which needs attention. *Employee engagement activities are not managed effectively and require improvement. *As the company is service-based, requirements often move slowly and may suddenly go on hold or get dropped. *Observed that communication skills and internal references sometimes influence selection decisions more than other factors. *Candidates with management or employee referrals tend to have higher chances of selection and expectation fulfillment. *Referrals are valuable, but candidates should be considered only if they meet job requirements and clear interviews with good communication skills. Recruitment team involvement appears limited; there is a perception of reduced voice or influence in hiring decisions which I have noticed

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All