employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Conservation International

Engaged Employer

Great staff, poor management - Anonymous employee Conservation International Employee Review

2.0
Apr 25, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Conservation International has an excellent global staff who works every day to make the world a better place to live. Benefits are good. Also, there are lots of opportunities for learning if you build the right network within the organization. For some positions, there are lots of opportunities for travel around the world.

Cons

The organization is poorly managed and very unstable. There was a change in the senior leadership by the end of 2014, making the organization worst than ever. There is a huge gap between HQ and Field that was widened because of the new leadership. Resources are scarce and staff turnover is very high in US. Promotions are ad hoc and do not follow a very consistent process. Staff morale is low and people are very afraid about the future. I have heard that some of the best staff have just left the organization and that several others key staff members are looking for jobs elsewhere. In summary, because the organization seems to be in permanent transition, I am very sad to say that Conservation International is certainly not a good place to work under the current leadership.

Explore other reviews about Conservation International

5.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues and workplace culture

Cons

Limited new hiring due to economy

1.0
Jul 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

fully remote work options available

Cons

nature finance group is a toxic workplace where a constant turf war is happening. nepotism is widespread. you only survive if you belong to one of the internal tribes. majority of effort concentrated to internal politics. Incoming vice presidents and above are largely insecure and mediocre staff only looking to cover their bases. low morale, sense of instability, lack of strategy, and poor management are visible at face value. Indicative that the management was cooking the employee survey results for almost a year.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All