employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CrossCountry Consulting

Engaged Employer

Poor career progression - but good workculture - Managing Consultant CrossCountry Consulting Employee Review

3.0
Nov 27, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Friendly colleagues, partners, and clients - Fair compensation (although reduced bonus' recently) - Work culture of 40 hours / week (good work/life balance)

Cons

- Poor career progression - Projects are back-office, boring, monotonous. - Limited upskilling or training opportunities within the company (don't even have good centralized data sources for templates, slide decks, etc. to use with clients ) - Company says they value your input, and desired career path, but project assignment does not reflect this

avatar
CrossCountry Consulting Response
6mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We're glad you valued the supportive work culture and work-life balance, and we're sorry your experience wasn’t fully what we strive to provide for our employees.

Explore other reviews about CrossCountry Consulting

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with clients and helping project teams complete their assignments. Good coordination with different departments. Knowledgeable and professional employees. Recognition for good work and opportunities to take on additional responsibilities.

Cons

Too much documentation and reporting on some projects

1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some colleagues demonstrated actual competence at their work.

Cons

• Senior staff controlled which people received high-profile assignments and advancement opportunities based on personal relationships rather than merit or performance • Colleagues outside the established inner circle were routinely overlooked for roles and projects while less experienced people with better connections moved ahead repeatedly • I brought relevant qualifications and took on difficult assignments, but my career progression stalled because I lacked the relationships that mattered for advancement • Career development conversations and advancement decisions happened without transparency or input from those being affected, determined entirely by people in charge • The organization made no effort to acknowledge the pattern of favoritism or implement systems that would ensure fair consideration for all employees

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All