employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CrossCountry Consulting

Engaged Employer

Senior Consultant - Senior Analyst CrossCountry Consulting Employee Review

3.0
Jan 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Variety of work which allowed for different experience

Cons

Lack of leadership and direction. Wasn't clear on roll up chart and felt alone a lot of the time.

avatar
CrossCountry Consulting Response
5mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. We’re glad to hear you valued the variety of work and opportunities to gain different experiences. We’re sorry to hear that you felt a lack of clarity and connection at times. Supporting our people is an ongoing top priority focus for us. For those looking to build community, we encourage getting involved in our CRG program or internal committees. We care deeply about our employees, so please reach out to your coach or leadership team to ensure you have the support needed.

Explore other reviews about CrossCountry Consulting

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with clients and helping project teams complete their assignments. Good coordination with different departments. Knowledgeable and professional employees. Recognition for good work and opportunities to take on additional responsibilities.

Cons

Too much documentation and reporting on some projects

1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some colleagues demonstrated actual competence at their work.

Cons

• Senior staff controlled which people received high-profile assignments and advancement opportunities based on personal relationships rather than merit or performance • Colleagues outside the established inner circle were routinely overlooked for roles and projects while less experienced people with better connections moved ahead repeatedly • I brought relevant qualifications and took on difficult assignments, but my career progression stalled because I lacked the relationships that mattered for advancement • Career development conversations and advancement decisions happened without transparency or input from those being affected, determined entirely by people in charge • The organization made no effort to acknowledge the pattern of favoritism or implement systems that would ensure fair consideration for all employees

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All