employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CrossCountry Consulting

Engaged Employer

Community Resource Groups Fully Supported - Consultant CrossCountry Consulting Employee Review

5.0
Jan 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

CrossCountry is known for its people-first culture. One of the key reasons for this is its commitment to belonging through Community Resource Groups. I have had the pleasure of being welcomed by CRG members as well as leading one of the groups and have benefited greatly. These groups allow employees - from all backgrounds - to develop a level of camaraderie with their colleagues that simply will not happen otherwise. This has downstream effects because that sense of acceptance allows us to be our full, confident selves and serve our clients with excellence.

Cons

CrossCountry treats its employees very well, however, lags behind in compensation.

avatar
CrossCountry Consulting Response
4mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback and for recognizing the strength of our Community Resource Groups. We’re proud of the role our CRGs play in fostering connection and belonging across the firm, and we appreciate your candid input on where we can continue to grow.

Explore other reviews about CrossCountry Consulting

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with clients and helping project teams complete their assignments. Good coordination with different departments. Knowledgeable and professional employees. Recognition for good work and opportunities to take on additional responsibilities.

Cons

Too much documentation and reporting on some projects

1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some colleagues demonstrated actual competence at their work.

Cons

• Senior staff controlled which people received high-profile assignments and advancement opportunities based on personal relationships rather than merit or performance • Colleagues outside the established inner circle were routinely overlooked for roles and projects while less experienced people with better connections moved ahead repeatedly • I brought relevant qualifications and took on difficult assignments, but my career progression stalled because I lacked the relationships that mattered for advancement • Career development conversations and advancement decisions happened without transparency or input from those being affected, determined entirely by people in charge • The organization made no effort to acknowledge the pattern of favoritism or implement systems that would ensure fair consideration for all employees

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All