employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CrossCountry Consulting

Engaged Employer

Unsustainable Workload Expectations! - Consultant CrossCountry Consulting Employee Review

1.0
Feb 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I had a chance to work with some smart and capable colleagues.

Cons

The workload expectations were consistently unrealistic and left little room for balance. Deadlines were aggressive regardless of staffing levels or project complexity. It was common to absorb additional responsibilities without adjustments to timelines. The pace felt relentless, with productivity measured primarily by output volume. There was minimal acknowledgment of the strain this created over time. The pressure did not feel temporary—it felt built into the structure.

avatar
CrossCountry Consulting Response
3mo
Thank you for sharing your perspective. We have some incredible people here, so we’re glad you had the opportunity to work alongside talented colleagues during your time with the firm. Your feedback regarding workload and project expectations is important to us. We remain committed to continuously improving how we balance delivering exceptional results for our clients with supporting the well-being of our teams.

Explore other reviews about CrossCountry Consulting

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with clients and helping project teams complete their assignments. Good coordination with different departments. Knowledgeable and professional employees. Recognition for good work and opportunities to take on additional responsibilities.

Cons

Too much documentation and reporting on some projects

1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some colleagues demonstrated actual competence at their work.

Cons

• Senior staff controlled which people received high-profile assignments and advancement opportunities based on personal relationships rather than merit or performance • Colleagues outside the established inner circle were routinely overlooked for roles and projects while less experienced people with better connections moved ahead repeatedly • I brought relevant qualifications and took on difficult assignments, but my career progression stalled because I lacked the relationships that mattered for advancement • Career development conversations and advancement decisions happened without transparency or input from those being affected, determined entirely by people in charge • The organization made no effort to acknowledge the pattern of favoritism or implement systems that would ensure fair consideration for all employees

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All