employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CrossCountry Consulting

Engaged Employer

Just another place that treats its employees like machines - Sales Development Representative CrossCountry Consulting Employee Review

1.0
Mar 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Just a job that pays when management's expectations are met.

Cons

Just another place that treats its employees like machines. Work happens, pay arrives, and that is all. Miss management's expectations and termination follows immediately. Decisions like that come easily, with little concern that a real person just lost a livelihood.

avatar
CrossCountry Consulting Response
3mo
We’re grateful you took the time to share your perspective. We take concerns around how employees are supported and treated very seriously, and we are continuously working to strengthen communication, expectations, and the overall employee experience.

Explore other reviews about CrossCountry Consulting

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with clients and helping project teams complete their assignments. Good coordination with different departments. Knowledgeable and professional employees. Recognition for good work and opportunities to take on additional responsibilities.

Cons

Too much documentation and reporting on some projects

1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some colleagues demonstrated actual competence at their work.

Cons

• Senior staff controlled which people received high-profile assignments and advancement opportunities based on personal relationships rather than merit or performance • Colleagues outside the established inner circle were routinely overlooked for roles and projects while less experienced people with better connections moved ahead repeatedly • I brought relevant qualifications and took on difficult assignments, but my career progression stalled because I lacked the relationships that mattered for advancement • Career development conversations and advancement decisions happened without transparency or input from those being affected, determined entirely by people in charge • The organization made no effort to acknowledge the pattern of favoritism or implement systems that would ensure fair consideration for all employees

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All