employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CrossCountry Consulting

Engaged Employer

Managing Consultant - Anonymous employee CrossCountry Consulting Employee Review

5.0
Aug 18, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

CrossCountry is the best place I have worked. Coming from a large consulting firm, it was a breath of fresh air to work with colleagues who truly care about you as a person and are passionate about building a great company. I've personally really enjoy my projects so far and have been given opportunities to develop new skills and take on additional job responsibility that I wouldn't have had at my past company. Additionally, I love that we are able to join internal groups that give us the opportunity to get exposure to other areas of interest within the company. I think CrossCountry is a great alternative to some of the other large companies out there - same competitive salaries and opportunities, but a much better culture in my opinion.

Cons

We've seen a lot of growth over the past year which is exciting but can also cause some bumps along the way. There has been a lot of change so sometimes it can be hard to keep up, but that is to be expected. Also, a year ago there wouldn't have been as much travel work. As we get more project work in different offices, there may be a need for some travel, but I think staffing does a good job of seeing if that will fit your lifestyle before sending you somewhere unlike some companies.

Explore other reviews about CrossCountry Consulting

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with clients and helping project teams complete their assignments. Good coordination with different departments. Knowledgeable and professional employees. Recognition for good work and opportunities to take on additional responsibilities.

Cons

Too much documentation and reporting on some projects

1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some colleagues demonstrated actual competence at their work.

Cons

• Senior staff controlled which people received high-profile assignments and advancement opportunities based on personal relationships rather than merit or performance • Colleagues outside the established inner circle were routinely overlooked for roles and projects while less experienced people with better connections moved ahead repeatedly • I brought relevant qualifications and took on difficult assignments, but my career progression stalled because I lacked the relationships that mattered for advancement • Career development conversations and advancement decisions happened without transparency or input from those being affected, determined entirely by people in charge • The organization made no effort to acknowledge the pattern of favoritism or implement systems that would ensure fair consideration for all employees

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All