Luc experience - Lecturer - Engineering ENGIE Employee Review

5.0
Mar 27, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Managing energy transformation, very broad area of expertise

Cons

Not agile enough, too bureaucratic

avatar
ENGIE Response
2y
Hello, thank you very much for this comment. Indeed, we are 96 000 Transition Makers committed to making the energy transition happen. As you know, ENGIE is acting every day to accelerating the energy transition to a carbon-neutral world, a transition in which you have been actively participating. ENGIE is an industrial company, and as such has processes to provide reliable, affordable and just energy transition. You can count on us to constantly improve these processes.

Explore other reviews about ENGIE

5.0
May 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Low stress nice co workers

Cons

Layed off after a year

1
avatar
ENGIE Response
1mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience at ENGIE and for giving us a 5-star rating. We are delighted to hear that you enjoyed a low-stress environment and appreciated your co-workers. At ENGIE, we are fully committed to offering the opportunity to make a difference within an engaged community working toward a desirable and inclusive future. However, we are sorry to hear that your journey with us came to an end after a year, and we truly value the contribution you made during your time here. We wish you the very best in your future professional endeavors. Best regards, The ENGIE Team
1.0
Jul 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Energy transition mission — The company’s stated purpose around decarbonization is compelling, and some teams genuinely care about delivering meaningful work. Global footprint — Access to international projects and exposure to large‑scale infrastructure.

Cons

HR alignment with management — HR consistently protects management rather than employees. Issues of mistreatment are often ignored, and retaliation is a real concern despite policies claiming zero tolerance. Humiliation and mistreatment — Employees are frequently spoken to disrespectfully, sometimes publicly. Escalating concerns rarely leads to resolution. Retaliation culture — Speaking up can result in negative consequences. Many employees stay silent out of fear. Low compensation — Salaries tend to fall below industry averages, with limited room for negotiation or adjustment. Incompetent leadership — Many leaders lack the experience needed to manage technical teams. Promotions often appear politically driven, with a noticeable preference for French nationals. Micromanagement — Leaders without hands‑on experience frequently micromanage seasoned professionals, creating frustration and inefficiency. Rigid office attendance — Flexibility has disappeared. Employees are threatened with termination if they don’t comply with strict in‑office requirements (e.g., 3 days minimum, 7‑hour presence). Punitive parking policies — Some employees were forced to pay daily parking fees as a form of punishment. No career development — Even inexpensive training is denied. Although development is advertised as a priority, in practice it is not supported for everyone. Lack of growth pathways — Promotions are rare, unclear, and often unrelated to merit. Unclear and biased performance evaluations — Performance reviews often rely on subjective, unsupported criteria, leading to inconsistent ratings and an unusually high number of employees placed on PIPs. Managers frequently introduce personal bias into evaluations, creating an environment where outcomes feel predetermined rather than based on actual performance. Benefits — average for the industry, higher end cost for health insurance premiums.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All