Great HR, very poor engineering management an product vision - Principal Software Engineer Expedia Group Employee Review

3.0
Apr 8, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Expedia is a great company to work for from the point of view of everything HR: benefits, vacation, quality of life, etc.

Cons

- No growth unless you are part of the inner circle. It's a well-known fact inside the company that a few individuals have benefited greatly from being part of a tightly knit group within which fast track to promotion is guaranteed, regardless of merit. - As a corollary to the above, independent-minded yet highly capable individuals will be kept at bay from any career progression. This is an untold rule that everyone is aware of, and such individuals, therefore, tend to leave. - The company is currently struggling to keep its place in the highly competitive online travel market and not able to think creatively. Management is risk-averse and will not commit to daring initiatives that would be necessary if Expedia were to become the market leader once again. - More specifically, as per the previous point: for senior directors and above, the key to survival is to not commit publicly to ambitious initiatives and rather let subordinates make the first step. These managers take credit if an initiative pans out, and distribute the blame if it doesn't. - The move to Bellevue will place the company in a difficult position, as most employees live on the East Side and are quite unhappy about the situation. The "top talent" that management hopes to attract once in Seattle will become disillusioned once realizing the type of management it is confronted with.

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
Dec 16, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

work life balance is chill, benefits are great, work can be rewarding

Cons

not as challenging, more of a coaster company, pay not as high

2.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, supportive manager, and genuinely pleasant colleagues.

Cons

Frequent reorgs and shifting strategic direction made it difficult to build momentum or plan long‑term. Over time, contractor roles became increasingly narrow and production‑focused, which limited opportunities for meaningful skill development. Responsibilities that originally included project management were reduced to primarily email production work. There’s also a broader corporate pattern where work is expected to be completed exactly as written, with little room for judgment or improvement. Even small, quick optimizations can lead to pushback rather than appreciation, creating an environment where going “above and beyond” requires multiple layers of approval — which defeats the purpose of being proactive in the first place. Finally, there’s an in‑office expectation (less strict than for full‑time employees, but still present) for work that can be done entirely remotely. This tends to benefit highly social personalities, but for those who prefer focused, independent work, it feels unnecessary. Social dynamics also play a noticeable role; if you’re not immediately well‑liked or you make a single early mistake, it can create a self‑fulfilling perception that’s difficult to overcome.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All