Top-tier company standards and practices, but unable to execute - Anonymous employee Gusto Employee Review

2.0
Feb 8, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Beautiful office spaces. Attracts quirky top-talent. Has a beautiful stated mission and vision. Robust diversity and inclusion programs.

Cons

Top-talent quickly comes and goes: shelf life for top performers is about a year. Company leadership frequently takes actions and makes decisions that go directly against the company's stated mission and vision. The diversity and inclusion focus has reached the level of obsession: it is the sole form of employee engagement offered at work. Top talent has been leaving the company for years now. What is being left behind is a 'neither here nor there' dead layer of middle management that lacks basic business and technology fundamentals. There are a lot of immature and inexperienced 'head of' folks that simply do not know how to do the work required for their role. A typical 'head of' leader looks like 1) Elite school 2) 2 to 3 years as an IC at a famous company then 3) 1 to 2 years at Gusto then TA-DA 'head of' product, marketing, data science, etc. There is no career path through middle management. If you have a wealth of previous experience before coming to Gusto and are not a 'head of' upon arrival at Gusto, your subject matter expertise will be rejected, resisted and refused. For example, you may find yourself spending hours explaining to a senior manager why due dates are a good thing, only to have them escalate to a 'head of' leader who decides that the project stakeholders that don't want to adhere to deadlines don't have to.

Explore other reviews about Gusto

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart and friendly coworkers. Excellent team culture

Cons

Tunnel visions on AI a bit too much

1
2.0
May 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The product is genuinely good, too bad the same can’t be said for how they treat the people who sell it.

Cons

Leadership talks a big game about people-first culture but the reality doesn’t match. The Chicago office expansion felt like a poorly thought-out experiment, new hires were brought on without a clear long-term commitment, and layoffs came without warning, leaving people blindsided. Crossing a billion dollars in revenue and still cutting employees sends a clear message about where workers rank on the priority list. Remote work flexibility is also a glaring weakness. For a company selling HR software to modern businesses, their internal stance on where employees can work is surprisingly rigid and hypocritical. The “flexibility” messaging is mostly optics. The broader concern is the AI roadmap. The automation push feels less like an innovation strategy and more like a slow wind-down of the workforce. Employees aren’t blind to it, it creates anxiety and erodes trust. The culture of transparency they promote externally is largely a facade internally.

12
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All