employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Hellman & Friedman

Is this your company?

The money is better than the atmosphere - Executive Assistant Hellman & Friedman Employee Review

3.0
Mar 4, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The compensation and benefits are solid. If you have ever worked in a corporate environment, you are good at what you do and you have a strong work ethic, you will be fine. If you know better than to buy into standard corporate lies such as "we are a family ...treat each other with grace ... we value the whole person" you will also be fine. Operate as if you are in a well paying job where they do not care about you as a person (let them think believe it all) and you will fit in well and even enjoy the many perks and benefits.

Cons

Hellman & Friedman is very good at selling an image. It is just that, an image. They have all of the standard personalities, cliques, ridiculous policies and managerial issues that any other professional firm has. They simply have enough money to make it appear that they are somehow different, caring and kind. They pretend to care about diversity. They do not. There virtually no BIPOC in senior leadership or managment and there are a cursory number of BIPOC individuals who are not in support roles.

Explore other reviews about Hellman & Friedman

5.0
Nov 18, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Small boutique feel, highly invested in their people, very hardworking, everyone aligned to same goal

Cons

Very demanding hours and career mobility at low levels

2.0
Mar 15, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Two stars total: one for food, snacks, and the office space; one for compensation.

Cons

The back office exhibits recurring leadership failures across multiple functions. In finance and accounting, management practices are frequently punitive and unprofessional. In some areas, interpersonal conduct that would typically warrant managerial intervention is not only tolerated but embedded in the culture, where it can appear normalized and, at times, implicitly rewarded. The admin team is poorly led, ethically questionable, and performative, with hiring often concentrated within a narrow circle of familiar personal networks, and its presence widely regarded internally as disruptive, insular, and self-reinforcing. Within facilities, the dynamic is uneven: some roles are marked by visible posturing and self-importance, while others appear defined by excessive deference to management and a readiness to relay all concerns and observations upward -- behavior once charitably attributed to inexperience but now more widely understood as a willingness to subordinate independent professional judgement in favor of visible loyalty. In practice, this dynamic reinforces the authority of a manager widely regarded internally as problematic. IT support demonstrates its own leadership deficiencies, further degrading cross-team effectiveness. In aggregate, these conditions enable inequitable treatment and inappropriate behavior, introduce operational friction, degrade performance, undermine morale, and contribute to an environment where safety is uneven at best. There is a clear gap between the firm's ethical and dignified self-image and the conduct it permits internally.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All