employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Los Angeles Metro

Is this your company?

"As-Needed" Employee - Countywide Planning - Transportation Planner I Los Angeles Metro Employee Review

2.0
Dec 9, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Valuable work experience, great networking opportunities within transportation planning, enjoyed lots of my coworkers

Cons

Most entry-level positions in countywide planning were part-time with no benefits or full-time but with extremely minimal benefits (no vacation hours, only health insurance and minimum sick hours, both as required by law). Many interns trying to come on as full-time or those seeking employment after completing grad school (not just college, but Master's Degrees) struggle to move up into permanent full-time positions. Job-seekers need non-intern work experience elsewhere, hence the Metro adage that to get promoted at Metro, you need to leave Metro (and someday come back at a higher pay grade). "As-Needed" or part-time hours only count as experience *per hour*, ie 3 years of part-time work would only count as 2 years of employment when it comes to evaluating qualifications for promotion or employment above an entry-level position. Metro HR will usually give you the benefit of the doubt and count part-time work elsewhere as if it were full-time if it isn't specified as part-time on your resume (but when they can see your Metro employment status, they only count it as hours worked). No OT paid for part-time employees, even if you work, say, a 10-hour day. Job duties and description barely differ between Planners or Planning Managers and the job title is only dependent on years of experience. So, many planners end up doing work well above their pay grade because of this flexibility. Even "entry level trainees" often do very little "training" and lots of work on par with planners. This does lead to great work experience that will fill up your resume and might get you a job anywhere else, however, those lower on the totem pole often experience lower morale while obtaining said experience. Once you're in as a higher-paid "Transportation Planning Manager", however, people seem to be in for life. More people get promoted to higher levels of Manager than not, as well. It is no surprise that there are more "Planning Managers" than "Planners", by something like 50%, at least.

Explore other reviews about Los Angeles Metro

5.0
Mar 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Paid time off Good Benefits Good work environment

Cons

Bidding positions and seniority with In the company oppose to specific departments

1.0
Jul 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Steady and consistent pay, pay tends to go up every few months or year by a dollar depending on the local rates without negotiating. It’s just automatic depending on external factors from the city.

Cons

Terrible leaders. No room to innovate. So many people aren’t qualified, they hire too much “diversity” without real skills. Lots of power trips and unresponsive people. Everything is archaic. You meet some amazing people from different departments that really boost moral and connections but even that was not enough for me. I wasn’t learning anything to grow my skills for landing better roles. It was a waste of time. I can make that pay anywhere else and gain much more experiences and skills to get much more momentum in career opportunities and better pay. My role at Metro was to just be a mule. Too much micromanagement from leaders that have never worked outside of metro. They just advance in their career from building connections and not because of hard skills. You will be dumbfounded to see the people in power. The building is incredibly outdated and dull. Completely uninspiring. The other divisions are modern but the main building at Union station is so dry once you get into the offices. It’s gross. The desks and carpet are disgusting. Managers, DEOs and supervisors are usually hired because they are favorites and not because they are good at the job and tasks. They should hire younger talent with much more skills and capacity to innovate. Those in charge have archaic ways of doing things that slow down progress, have inconsistencies, and are redundant and you waste time with the tasks. I had times when they were against me wanting to use formulas on excel for calculations. They wanted me to count of fingers pretty much for hundreds of cells! What an absolute JOKE! They lack training and they do not support employees. They just bark meaningless orders that contributes no values using archaic resources. So controlling. I am better off being self employed and an independent contractor in the private sector to take control of the tools and software I want to use. At metro they use so much outdated and cheap tools. I just no longer want to be apart of that mess. No other department is worth it. People that stay are okay with being a puppet, people pleasing doormat, or they want to spread negative energy and be controlling as if you are the one to blame for their miserable person lives. I have morals, standards, ambition and self respect. The toxic workplace is not worth the steady paycheck at all. You can be self employed, work part time, invest, and other things and live a much better life. Metro is for people that are okay with losing their soul.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All