Run, run, just as fast as you can, AWAY! - Nurse Practitioner Monogram Health Employee Review

1.0
Jun 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Never identified any; nothing, nothing

Cons

Where to start? The dysfunctional charting system in 2 EMR’s…archaic. NP’s having to schedule their own patients while staff is being paid to do it; constant micromanagement by people who clearly have never been involved in direct patient care. It’s not about the patients; it’s about numbers. All the doctor was worried about was how they were going to get the numbers up to qualify for a bonus. Lots of promises to reel you in, and then the amnesia starts. “Oh, did we say that?”….the concept is great, but the current model lacks. These poor patients are bombarded with phone calls to get them to enroll, so that, by the time the NP gets to them, they are suspicious of the program or don’t want to deal with it anymore. I don’t believe any of the support staff can read, because, no matter that you wrote that the person can’t do a telehealth visit, they schedule them one. And the meetings….meetings about meetings…again, patient care on the back burner here. Now, let’s talk about the driving —here, there, everywhere. “Oh, you just drove a 150 miles? 2 patients, but you want me to see 5?” Well, let’s repeat it again the next day. And let’s not forget the medieval reimbursement for gas at 44 cents/mile…..nope, not a typo. I think I got paid that 15 years ago. Crappy orientation that leads to a set up for failure.

Explore other reviews about Monogram Health

5.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great support from all levels of leadership. Very competitive pay, bonus structure and benefits. Meaningful work

Cons

Changes with processes at times

2.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits were okay. Three telephonic days per week.

Cons

While Monogram’s mission is meaningful, there were significant challenges that impacted the ability to provide quality client care. Productivity metrics often seemed to take precedence over individualized client needs, and social workers carried extremely large caseloads of approximately 500 members while managing extensive territories. Expectations included frequent cold-calling, unannounced home visits, and maintaining a high volume of daily visits despite significant drive time and documentation requirements. Frequent operational changes and shifting expectations created inconsistency, and there were times when social workers’ clinical judgment and professional expertise did not appear to be fully trusted or valued. The combination of large caseloads, extensive travel, high productivity demands, and ongoing turnover made the role difficult to sustain long term. Greater investment in staff support, manageable caseloads, and a stronger balance between metrics and client-centered care would improve both employee satisfaction and client outcomes.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All