Not what it seems - Manager Perry Homes Employee Review

1.0
Mar 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice office location and some benefits

Cons

The company presents an image of inclusivity and professionalism, but internally it often feels like a “boys and girls club.” Loyalty to leadership matters more than performance, good people are let go to protect tenured executives, and employees are quickly thrown under the bus if things go wrong. Family members and neighbors in management positions can make advancement feel subjective and politically driven. Major operational decisions are often rushed just to meet timelines. Software changes are poorly executed, leaving vendors frustrated and teams overworked. Expansion into new markets was prioritized over existing ones, causing backlash and added strain on already stretched teams. If you question leadership or stop “drinking the Kool-Aid,” it quickly becomes clear you’re no longer part of the inner circle. The brand image and the day-to-day reality are very different.

Explore other reviews about Perry Homes

5.0
Jul 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Catered lunch daily College scholarship for children Flexible schedule

Cons

They say as a company they are open to people moving to different roles / departments. That was not my experience.

1.0
Apr 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Looks good on resume so you can leave

Cons

From the outside, this company looks polished and well-run, but working here feels very different. There’s a real lack of transparency from leadership, and decisions tend to be made behind closed doors by a boys club with little explanation or accountability all while using the branding of being woman led to hide this. A lot of lower-level managers are brought in straight out of school and they’re quickly shaped to fall in line rather than think independently or advocate for their teams. “Independent thinking” gets talked about a lot, but it often feels like it’s only welcomed if it aligns and protects leadership’s views. In many cases where reporting was questioned, the VP in charge through employees under the bus instead of taking ownership. In some departments, there’s heavy reliance on temp-to-hire roles. It creates the impression that employees are viewed as easily replaceable, with little long-term investment in their growth or stability. That kind of structure can make people feel disposable and hesitant to fully engage. One of the biggest issues is how concerns are handled. People who speak up about real problems can end up being labeled “unprofessional” without much explanation or documentation. There is an intentional culture created where employees keep their heads down instead of being honest. There’s a clear gap between what the company says it stands for and how things actually operate day to day. Over time, that disconnect makes it hard to trust leadership or feel confident in the direction of the organization.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All