Ops Manager - Anonymous employee Randstad US Employee Review

2.0
Jan 26, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good office environment with good-hearted people to work with. People were mostly friendly and fairly easy to work with.

Cons

Communication was poor, much more than I expected. Standard processes took an extremely long time to accomplish (i.e., it's a 2 week process before you can get your laptop). It is understood that it is still a small and upcoming technology company...it employs a conglomerate of personnel from multiple small technology companies. The opportunities for improvement are in a few areas, mostly in communication...things were going on around me and I had absolutely no clue as to what was happening and no one offered or invited me to anything; my team and I were simply in the dark. Also, the policies in place were for Randstad (consulting company), but not for the technology side. It was funny that I would ask three people a common company question (i.e., do we work the day after Thanksgiving?) and I would get three different answers! The biggest issue I had (and mine may have been an isolated issue) is mid-level management. Communication with my manager was extremely poor (the worst I've experienced in 30+ years). I didn't think much of it at first...I learned that my manager was fairly new to his position, and may not have had much experience in leading people. Things went downhill very quickly...no communication, cancelled one-on-ones week after week, lack of support, no acknowledgment of accomplishments or successes and then finally being accused of doing 'nothing'. It was a very demeaning and the most unprofessional approach I've experienced with anyone that I reported to. HR began to get involved but I halted it because I didn't want to negatively impact someone's career. Bottom line is, mid-level leadership was not just poor, it was non-existent. Not to mention some 'under-handed manipulation' in the hiring process. Again, I'm not trying to speak for everyone, but it was obvious to myself and my team that we had no support. When you can walk by your people everyday and never speak to them, there's a grave leadership problem.

avatar
Randstad US Response
8y
Thank you for this detailed feedback and insight. We will be sure our management teams see your advice to improve. We thank you for taking the time to share.

Explore other reviews about Randstad US

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great salary and benefits Supportive team

Cons

Clients can be difficult to work for

1.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive compensation and benefits. Opportunities to build strong client relationships and develop HR and leadership skills. I was fortunate to work for a direct manager who genuinely supported and believed in me, which made my experience positive for several years. High performers can receive meaningful recognition, such as Presidents Club, and the role provides valuable experience in employee relations, recruiting, operations, and client management that can strengthen your résumé. A good company to get some experience but not a good long term company to work for.

Cons

Lack of transparency and accountability. My biggest issue was not being terminated—it was how the company handled it. Although I understand Connecticut is an at-will employment state, I believe employees deserve an honest explanation when their employment ends. Despite repeatedly asking, I was never told why I was being terminated. I went nearly three months without an answer and only learned the company’s stated reason after reviewing unemployment paperwork they submitted while contesting my claim. Prior to my termination, I had never received formal discipline or written warnings. Just two months earlier, I had earned Presidents Club, one of the company’s highest performance recognitions. Going from being recognized as a top performer to being terminated without a meaningful explanation was shocking and left me questioning the company’s commitment to transparency and fairness. In my experience, Human Resources did not provide answers or advocate for transparency. Instead, I felt they supported leadership’s decision without giving me the information I was requesting. During my years with the company, I also observed situations involving other employees that, in hindsight, made me question how employment decisions were handled. After my own experience, I came away feeling that performance alone did not determine job security. I also perceived that long-tenured employees were treated differently than newer employees, regardless of performance. One of the most unsettling parts of my experience was feeling that if leadership became unhappy with an employee, that employee could be terminated with little explanation. Whether or not that was actually the reason in every case, it created an environment where I felt job security depended more on staying in favor than on performance. That uncertainty made the workplace feel unpredictable and, ultimately, unsettling. If transparency, communication, and feeling valued as an employee are important to you, my experience suggests you should ask careful questions before accepting a position. My experience at the end of my employment was completely different from the company I believed I had been working for during my first several years.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All