Rough place- avoid if you want career stability - Staffing Manager Randstad US Employee Review

1.0
Oct 13, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) The work was fun and within about a month, you will know if you are beginning to get somewhere. 2) The training is thorough.

Cons

1) The company is highly focused on money, especially in a COVID cash-strapped world. 2) They talk a good game about caring for employees, but don't deliver on that. It is a sink-or-swim environment. 3) The company has been in a panic since no one was hiring due to COVID recently. Managers still don't know how to react going from a great economy to a recovering one. 4) Other companies are cheaper and find the same people, in fact sometimes the EXACT same people... employers know it too, so why choose Randstad? 5) Managers will throw you under the bus if their bottom-line for their branch isn't acceptable to higher. 6) They expect the branches to do all of the work for the areas they cover-down on, which is fine, but some areas are better than others in terms of sales. There is extra pressure on the staffing managers in these lower-earning territories to perform. 7) Targets for revenue during COVID were unrealistic for the emergency duration. 8) 20% staffing reduction and 5% pay cut within a month of COVID 19... more are probably coming after COVID settles out, but that is speculative. 9) The clientele is blue-collar and so is the management at branch level. If you don't like to work with blue-collar types, this is certainly not the job for you. 10) Company IT stinks badly... it is an amalgam of old and new systems that do not always have compatibility or ease-of-use. If you get annoyed easily with bad computer systems, DO NOT work here. Randstad was probably hot stuff in the Netherlands where they were founded, but in the US market, there is WAY more competition and other companies will undercut Randstad pretty easily price and quality-wise for temp labor.

Explore other reviews about Randstad US

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great salary and benefits Supportive team

Cons

Clients can be difficult to work for

1.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive compensation and benefits. Opportunities to build strong client relationships and develop HR and leadership skills. I was fortunate to work for a direct manager who genuinely supported and believed in me, which made my experience positive for several years. High performers can receive meaningful recognition, such as Presidents Club, and the role provides valuable experience in employee relations, recruiting, operations, and client management that can strengthen your résumé. A good company to get some experience but not a good long term company to work for.

Cons

Lack of transparency and accountability. My biggest issue was not being terminated—it was how the company handled it. Although I understand Connecticut is an at-will employment state, I believe employees deserve an honest explanation when their employment ends. Despite repeatedly asking, I was never told why I was being terminated. I went nearly three months without an answer and only learned the company’s stated reason after reviewing unemployment paperwork they submitted while contesting my claim. Prior to my termination, I had never received formal discipline or written warnings. Just two months earlier, I had earned Presidents Club, one of the company’s highest performance recognitions. Going from being recognized as a top performer to being terminated without a meaningful explanation was shocking and left me questioning the company’s commitment to transparency and fairness. In my experience, Human Resources did not provide answers or advocate for transparency. Instead, I felt they supported leadership’s decision without giving me the information I was requesting. During my years with the company, I also observed situations involving other employees that, in hindsight, made me question how employment decisions were handled. After my own experience, I came away feeling that performance alone did not determine job security. I also perceived that long-tenured employees were treated differently than newer employees, regardless of performance. One of the most unsettling parts of my experience was feeling that if leadership became unhappy with an employee, that employee could be terminated with little explanation. Whether or not that was actually the reason in every case, it created an environment where I felt job security depended more on staying in favor than on performance. That uncertainty made the workplace feel unpredictable and, ultimately, unsettling. If transparency, communication, and feeling valued as an employee are important to you, my experience suggests you should ask careful questions before accepting a position. My experience at the end of my employment was completely different from the company I believed I had been working for during my first several years.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All