DO NOT TRUST MANAGERS AND AVPs - Full Desk Recruiter Randstad US Employee Review

1.0
Aug 29, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

None at the moment. Very difficult to find pros at a place where you can't trust anyone.

Cons

Where to begin: First of all, this is going to be about 80% sales, 20% recruiting. During your interview process, you will be told that there is potential for making +50% in branch bonuses, but with the current market and things not improving (some of the highest minimum wages in the country and inflation worse than the national average), don't expect to bonus anytime soon. More importantly, do NOT trust your managers or your AVPs (Area Vice Presidents aka district managers). My AVP, the AVP of SoCal, will lie, omit facts, and cast blame on everybody but herself. Multiple people in her district, both in WA and SoCal, have told me about all the shady stuff she has done to keep her job. She's a horrible leader. She has put people on Performance Improvement Plans without going through the proper channels, placed blame on everyone but herself, and constantly tries to gaslight people to protect herself. She placed one worker on a PIP, despite that worker having better metrics than everyone else in her branch, for personal reasons. This AVP makes an effort to find out who gives her bad reviews during the quarterly "anonymous" surveys as well. If you are in WA or SoCal and you apply for Randstad, I strongly urge you to look elsewhere. If you're a recruiter, look at staffing agencies where it's only recruiting. If you're into sales, try to get into SaaS or other software/cloud-based tech. Do NOT work for Randstad and more importantly, do NOT work in SoCal. Even her job ad is a lie: "Looking for recruiters in XXX, XXX, and XXX," even though recruiting is now maybe 20%-30% of the job of staffing managers for Randstad OTS.

Explore other reviews about Randstad US

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great salary and benefits Supportive team

Cons

Clients can be difficult to work for

1.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive compensation and benefits. Opportunities to build strong client relationships and develop HR and leadership skills. I was fortunate to work for a direct manager who genuinely supported and believed in me, which made my experience positive for several years. High performers can receive meaningful recognition, such as Presidents Club, and the role provides valuable experience in employee relations, recruiting, operations, and client management that can strengthen your résumé. A good company to get some experience but not a good long term company to work for.

Cons

Lack of transparency and accountability. My biggest issue was not being terminated—it was how the company handled it. Although I understand Connecticut is an at-will employment state, I believe employees deserve an honest explanation when their employment ends. Despite repeatedly asking, I was never told why I was being terminated. I went nearly three months without an answer and only learned the company’s stated reason after reviewing unemployment paperwork they submitted while contesting my claim. Prior to my termination, I had never received formal discipline or written warnings. Just two months earlier, I had earned Presidents Club, one of the company’s highest performance recognitions. Going from being recognized as a top performer to being terminated without a meaningful explanation was shocking and left me questioning the company’s commitment to transparency and fairness. In my experience, Human Resources did not provide answers or advocate for transparency. Instead, I felt they supported leadership’s decision without giving me the information I was requesting. During my years with the company, I also observed situations involving other employees that, in hindsight, made me question how employment decisions were handled. After my own experience, I came away feeling that performance alone did not determine job security. I also perceived that long-tenured employees were treated differently than newer employees, regardless of performance. One of the most unsettling parts of my experience was feeling that if leadership became unhappy with an employee, that employee could be terminated with little explanation. Whether or not that was actually the reason in every case, it created an environment where I felt job security depended more on staying in favor than on performance. That uncertainty made the workplace feel unpredictable and, ultimately, unsettling. If transparency, communication, and feeling valued as an employee are important to you, my experience suggests you should ask careful questions before accepting a position. My experience at the end of my employment was completely different from the company I believed I had been working for during my first several years.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All