I wish the cons were only about the restrooms... - Interior Designer Rockwell Group Employee Review

2.0
Jun 11, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people are incredibly brilliant, even if they come and go. You will cross paths with intelligent minds and form friendships that are more than just networks. Rockwell group has a strong root in a meritocrat system, which is very attractive to designers wanting to turn into leaders. High profile clients, dogs in the office, a resourceful materials library, and summer Fridays, are all perks one shouldn't take for granted.

Cons

I echo the reviews earlier. The firm does not seem to show any value towards employees which can be noticed in small gestures such as not providing a warm welcome to new starters (which due to large turnover rates are many, and often filter in unnoticed), to how layoffs were handled in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic. Additionally, I can only speak for Studio G regarding the level of politics that served as the undercurrent for staffing. There is a repulsive amount of favoritism amongst senior staff that was pervasive enough for other designers to feel discriminated against, and for leadership to be aware of, yet not address.

Explore other reviews about Rockwell Group

5.0
Jul 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I was given immediate opportunities to work on multiple projects even as an intern. Felt a part of the team from day one. Highly recommend applying to Rockwell Group. Also, a pro is that the office is dog-friendly!

Cons

No cons by any means. Learned so much there.

2.0
Apr 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Interesting and high-visibility projects. The company has strong industry recognition and a reputable brand.

Cons

No matter how much effort you put in, studio leadership often has little visibility into individual contributions. Significant time investment—even sustained 100-hour workweeks over multiple months—does not lead to recognition or compensation. Work quality alone is not enough. Recognition tends to depend more on self-promotion and communication than on actual output. As a result, contributions can go unnoticed or be misattributed. There are also concerns around accountability. In some cases, senior staff disengage during critical deadlines yet still receive credit for completed work. This creates an uneven and discouraging environment for those carrying the workload. The culture appears to prioritize internal politics over merit. Attempts to raise concerns through HR have not led to meaningful change. When individuals who contribute to revenue are protected despite toxic behavior, it leaves others to absorb the negative impact. Overall, this dynamic leads to burnout, lack of recognition, and limited trust in leadership processes.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All