Interesting Place to Work - Project Manager/Architect Rockwell Group Employee Review

5.0
Jan 17, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

lots of ongoing projects, high energy office, lots of motivated coworkers. David Rockwell is a genuinely kind and interested person who wants to get to know his staff, and this is quite motivating. lots of office-wide and team-wide social events. people like their jobs. working in hospitality/interiors means product vendors bring you free stuff and free food.

Cons

Some of the projects are more interested than others. project managers handle a lot of stress, because deadlines and client needs can be erratic. younger designers get restaffed often based on project needs. overtime is sporadic and can be high, especially in schematic design. the expectation is to be in the office at least 4, maybe 5 days a week depending on your role. I'm definitely stressed but not quitting yet..

Explore other reviews about Rockwell Group

5.0
Jul 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I was given immediate opportunities to work on multiple projects even as an intern. Felt a part of the team from day one. Highly recommend applying to Rockwell Group. Also, a pro is that the office is dog-friendly!

Cons

No cons by any means. Learned so much there.

2.0
Apr 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Interesting and high-visibility projects. The company has strong industry recognition and a reputable brand.

Cons

No matter how much effort you put in, studio leadership often has little visibility into individual contributions. Significant time investment—even sustained 100-hour workweeks over multiple months—does not lead to recognition or compensation. Work quality alone is not enough. Recognition tends to depend more on self-promotion and communication than on actual output. As a result, contributions can go unnoticed or be misattributed. There are also concerns around accountability. In some cases, senior staff disengage during critical deadlines yet still receive credit for completed work. This creates an uneven and discouraging environment for those carrying the workload. The culture appears to prioritize internal politics over merit. Attempts to raise concerns through HR have not led to meaningful change. When individuals who contribute to revenue are protected despite toxic behavior, it leaves others to absorb the negative impact. Overall, this dynamic leads to burnout, lack of recognition, and limited trust in leadership processes.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All