employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Selective Insurance

Engaged Employer

Most arrogant company I've ever worked for - Agency Management Specialist Selective Insurance Employee Review

2.0
Nov 18, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay is great. Great salary & individual bonus program for Agency Management Specialists. Ability to buy stock at a 15% discount as well.

Cons

You are definitely working for a stock carrier & one that would have to be one of the more arrogant in the industry. High turnover in management. It is your classic east coast carrier that operates in a vacuum. Outrageous expectations of the field personnel & no differentiation between states. Underwriting mgmt always looking over your shoulder & auditing files. Classic beat down job that makes employees feel trapped based on great pay/unrealistic expectations & even worse work environment.

Explore other reviews about Selective Insurance

5.0
Apr 17, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Cons

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1.0
May 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Cons

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All