employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Selective Insurance

Engaged Employer

DO NOT ACCEPT AN OFFER - Senior Claims Representative Selective Insurance Employee Review

1.0
Jan 25, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I can not think of a single pro of working as a claims adjuster for Selective Insurance especially in the Auto department.

Cons

The place is an absolute dumpster fire of a work environment. Get ready to be rewarded with more work from people who can’t properly do their job. Leadership and direct supervisors lack credible knowledge and experience to do their job correctly. There is no repercussions for subpar employees except that their claims find a way off their desk. Speaking of claims, they love to play “where can I hide these claims” by claim dumping onto adjusters desk and telling them to do their best when someone quits then that person tends to quit creating a chain of pass offs. If you speak up you will face repercussions. They claim they promote from within but will always choose an outside candidate with experience rather than providing the training to a current employee to grow. Absolutely zero ongoing training and loves to put on a show about how much they care about employees yet come time to show it (raises) somehow they just can’t do anything for you.

Explore other reviews about Selective Insurance

5.0
Apr 17, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Cons

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1.0
May 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Cons

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All