Great people, horrible management and everything else - Supply Chain Sierra Space Employee Review

1.0
Jan 21, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Really talented and great people filling out the core roles throughout many different functions 401K match is great in theory. It has a 5 year vesting schedule which may never be realized given employment challenges and minimal company resources. Cool/exciting programs that allow for direct involvement in innovative space industry projects. Good resume experience for other Aero companies.

Cons

Too many to outline but I will try. First and foremost, the company is significantly resource strapped. This obviously affects everything that an average employee would experience. Pay raises and job growth opportunities are minimal to non-existent in most areas. In November of 2023 the company celebrated shipping Dreamchaser away from the factory and had a big event. The next day, hundreds of people were laid off during Thanksgiving week and the media caught wind of this and reported the layoffs. Since then, there have been numerous layoffs across all areas of the organization that happen in "Stealthy" increments to avoid the negative publicity of the first big round. One day 12 people in and org will be gone, the following Monday 10 more, etc. etc. No advanced communication of this, just people showing up to the office with their badge not working. Morale was TERRIBLE everywhere you look and people left for greener pastures. Despite layoffs and voluntary departures, countless job functions were left empty and the remaining people took on 3-4x the amount of work as before with ZERO increase in comp for years. Theoretically, this can all change if (BIG if) main company goals are achieved. Bonuses went away for 2024 as they were tied to one company goal everyone knew was unobtainable. In general, pay is below industry average. I had numerous co-workers leave for lateral positions across the industry who received 20-30% pay raises in doing so. From a management and ELT level, I can only speak to my experiences but there are numerous cases of inappropriate behavior. Directors cursing at employees and referencing their own early career experiences 35+ years ago as a tool of manipulation to have employees dedicate all their free time to working on programs (most of which who do not get paid overtime). The VP to employee ratio is insane as well. There are too many VP's filling arbitrary positions that don't serve any apparent benefit to company performance when performance is so dire. These are complete nepotism hires as they frequently are all ELT buddies looking for the cushy comp package before leaving in two years for retirement. For a long time, the directions from leadership were that small teams, with no resources, undefined strategy, or fully filled out skill mixes had to outperform legacy aero companies. Saying quite literally, "we need to do twice as much at half the cost" is great in theory but there was never any pathway to achieving these goals. From a benefits perspective, everything has slowly gone away. No more education assistance, 9x80's are long gone, and numerous other benefits that were ok are now gone altogether. The CEO was asked at an all hands if he would mandate full time RTO and he said he didn't believe in mandates and would never do one, allowing the decisions to flow through specific teams where in office requirements can be evaluated based on job function. Then one month later, the most poorly communicated RTO mandate happened. Areas like software engineers all left and it had to be backtracked for certain job functions but other areas had to be fully in office still. This would be acceptable if there was any sense of fairness or consistency but some VPs would still work remotely throughout the week and some teams had no oversight while others were heavily micromanaged. It was very demoralizing coming in on Friday's to an empty office so I can call people on teams and speak to no one throughout the day because of a mandate that was never communicated. Almost not even worth speaking to culture and values because everything is on life support. Turnover across all areas of the business prevents any culture and defined values from taking root. You go here to work for below average pay with no consideration of flexibility and hope you don't get laid off or get stuck doing the job of 4 people. The culture is hoping your immediate team is good and in the trenches with you. Overall, the lack of resources, "disappearing" coworkers in crucial roles at random intervals from arbitrary layoffs, terrible management, toxic work environment, and generally terrible morale defines the last several years. The billions raised didn't last long and while some investments were fruitful, the core resources are completely gone. I remember joining Sierra with genuine excitement. The marketing is sensational here but please be warned about joining Sierra unless you are truly desperate with no other options.

Explore other reviews about Sierra Space

5.0
Jul 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Joined a few months ago, right as Dan Jablonsky (ex-Maxar, ex-Ursa Major) took over as CEO and the company closed a $550M Series C at an $8B valuation. That combination of new operational leadership plus fresh capital is rare to walk into, and you can feel the shift toward more disciplined execution already. The mission itself is the real draw: Dream Chaser, the LIFE habitat, Orbital Reef, national security space work. The company is pushing hard on modern AI tooling across engineering, from code assistance to workflow automation, so you’re not fighting decade-old tooling to get things done. And unlike the primes, the company is still small enough that an individual engineer can move a program forward, not just a ticket queue. If you want your work to be traceable to a launch, this is one of the few places left where that’s true.

Cons

This is a company mid-transition: post-spinoff, post-CEO-change, scaling fast, so process and communication are still catching up to ambition. Expect some rough edges: unclear ownership on cross-team work, evolving standards, and the pace that comes with a fast-growing R&D shop. If you need a fully mature org chart and buttoned-up process on day one, wait a year or two.

1.0
Jul 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay was decent and 401k match was great if you could last that long.

Cons

This was the biggest speed bump in my career to date. The company was dragged down by the dream chaser heritage and process. Nothing moves fast, I’m not sure how much work is actually happening here. Everyone seems busy with endless meeting yet nothing gets done. Their satellite production facility was nothing more than a couple empty buildings they had a lease on, no real work happened to develop these into workable spaces and they sat empty while we had more meetings to talk about what we should do. Little to no ability to progress in your career, rarely saw promotions other than senior leadership. PTO policy was subpar, two weeks per year that must be accrued is terrible for anyone mid career and above.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All