employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Spectrum Association Management

Is this your company?

Run! - Anonymous employee Spectrum Association Management Employee Review

1.0
Dec 30, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

a low paycheck while looking for another job!

Cons

Owner lives in a 750K home on Canyon Springs Golf course and continues to underpay its employees. Turnover is extremely high. Senior leadership is inexperienced. Company loves to tell people they are voted SA best places to work. In reality, its a purchased (fake) award from SA Biz Journal. Anyone with a little internet research can verify all the above. Growth opportunity does not exist and this place is a dead end job.

avatar
Spectrum Association Management Response
8y
Dear Run, Sorry, we were not a match, it sounds like your heart was never in it if you were using your time to look for another job. I think you would be happy with the direction of the company. Over the past few weeks, the executive team held in-person meetings with every team in the company. In these meetings each of the concerns you shared were addressed. Each employee got to see how the company is performing and how the owners are investing in our employees. We also got to hear about all of the internal promotions in 2017 and the career track for each role, among many other items. We hope you found what you were looking for elsewhere and that you have a terrific career!

Explore other reviews about Spectrum Association Management

5.0
Sep 16, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

PTO, Culture, Management. Almost everything is a pro

Cons

Nothing. I would say MAYBE pay

1
3.0
Jan 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Competitive benefits package, including five weeks of PTO, which is generous for the industry - Overall company culture is generally positive on the surface - At the time, the Austin team was collaborative and supportive, with strong peer relationships - Client-facing leadership was capable and invested in maintaining good relationships - The role offered solid exposure to the Austin market and portfolio operations

Cons

- Significant leadership inconsistencies that negatively impacted morale, trust, and daily operations - While PTO is generous in theory, workload and expectations often made it difficult to realistically take time off - The Austin market lacked sufficient structure and operational clarity, leading to inefficiencies and unnecessary stress - Senior leadership support often felt performative rather than actionable, particularly during high-pressure periods - People management was a major weakness, with poor communication, limited accountability, and inadequate support for employees - Most concerning was how employee departures were handled. Professionalism and respect were not maintained after notice was given, creating an environment that felt uncomfortable and, at times, perceived as retaliatory - Leadership behavior during transitions undermined trust and left a lasting negative impression

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All