employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Spectrum Association Management

Is this your company?

Not as advertised - Can Not Say Spectrum Association Management Employee Review

1.0
Feb 27, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great coworkers, just feel sad for them for being there.

Cons

The company as a whole is not a good place to work at. They do not like to give raises UNLESS you go in and beg for it. Don't think about trying to advance in the company, "we have you exactly where we want you". The company is loaded with VIPs and not one of them was promoted from within. Unless you fit an image, you will be miserable there because you have to be the face of the company. You can't rely on your hard work to get you anywhere, because the board members still hold your jobs in their hands. What that says is zero support from your superiors. It's a sad thing when you don't even get paid for your extra time put in, it only gets you a demotion. I have never seen a company where employees are itching to get out of, the turn over is extremely high. They will even go as far as letting employees work from out of state to hide it. As for the positive reviews written, especially the one that said working in 100 degree conditions. Where was that???, I thought sweatshops were illegal.

Explore other reviews about Spectrum Association Management

5.0
Sep 16, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

PTO, Culture, Management. Almost everything is a pro

Cons

Nothing. I would say MAYBE pay

1
3.0
Jan 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Competitive benefits package, including five weeks of PTO, which is generous for the industry - Overall company culture is generally positive on the surface - At the time, the Austin team was collaborative and supportive, with strong peer relationships - Client-facing leadership was capable and invested in maintaining good relationships - The role offered solid exposure to the Austin market and portfolio operations

Cons

- Significant leadership inconsistencies that negatively impacted morale, trust, and daily operations - While PTO is generous in theory, workload and expectations often made it difficult to realistically take time off - The Austin market lacked sufficient structure and operational clarity, leading to inefficiencies and unnecessary stress - Senior leadership support often felt performative rather than actionable, particularly during high-pressure periods - People management was a major weakness, with poor communication, limited accountability, and inadequate support for employees - Most concerning was how employee departures were handled. Professionalism and respect were not maintained after notice was given, creating an environment that felt uncomfortable and, at times, perceived as retaliatory - Leadership behavior during transitions undermined trust and left a lasting negative impression

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All