employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Spectrum Association Management

Is this your company?

The people in the lower-levels of the company were great!! Upper Management not supportive of its workers - Community Manager Spectrum Association Management Employee Review

2.0
Jun 18, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Freedom to go out to visit properties when needed. Fun & reliable co-workers. Individual decision-making in a team-like environment. A lot of great people work at entry-level and community management positions.

Cons

Upper Management is not a positive group of people. Always looking for your faults, rarely supportive. The company has lost site of it's overall goals. Mission statement of the company very secretive. No transparency. You are made to feel as though each day is your last and you are lucky to be there. Work-load is well-beyond manageable. You may be given as much as 20,000 homes or 8-9 communities to manage all at once. Expected to conduct regular and bi-montly Board of Director meetings. They advertise salaries up to $50,000 per year. In reality you can expect somewhere around $35,000. A typical work day will begin at 7:30-7:45 and go until 8:00-10:00pm depending on whether or not you have a Board meeting to conduct. In addition, you are on-call 24/7 and are expected to answer the call within 15 mins. or less. There are repercussions if you don't.

Explore other reviews about Spectrum Association Management

5.0
Sep 16, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

PTO, Culture, Management. Almost everything is a pro

Cons

Nothing. I would say MAYBE pay

1
3.0
Jan 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Competitive benefits package, including five weeks of PTO, which is generous for the industry - Overall company culture is generally positive on the surface - At the time, the Austin team was collaborative and supportive, with strong peer relationships - Client-facing leadership was capable and invested in maintaining good relationships - The role offered solid exposure to the Austin market and portfolio operations

Cons

- Significant leadership inconsistencies that negatively impacted morale, trust, and daily operations - While PTO is generous in theory, workload and expectations often made it difficult to realistically take time off - The Austin market lacked sufficient structure and operational clarity, leading to inefficiencies and unnecessary stress - Senior leadership support often felt performative rather than actionable, particularly during high-pressure periods - People management was a major weakness, with poor communication, limited accountability, and inadequate support for employees - Most concerning was how employee departures were handled. Professionalism and respect were not maintained after notice was given, creating an environment that felt uncomfortable and, at times, perceived as retaliatory - Leadership behavior during transitions undermined trust and left a lasting negative impression

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All