employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Spectrum Association Management

Is this your company?

Not Recommended - Anonymous Spectrum Association Management Employee Review

2.0
Jul 30, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This company is cheap! The employees pay for things that the company should be taking care of. The owner would rather tell the workers corny inspirational quotes over the intercom than directly address the issues..issues like employee retention. This is a small company and people are quitting all the time! Hiring and training is expensive and that is where all the money is going. I've seen so many people quit, not fired, quit. They have a deaf ear towards the concerns of the employees and it's discouraging. Clients are permitted to be very disrespectful towards the workers because it's "Part of the job". I've worked in various different industries and being cursed at and mailed dog droppings was never a part of my job description. I don't recommend unless you have an exit plan and will be gone within a year.

Cons

Hidden requirements for employees like the *$100000 requirement* for auto insurance if you drive for them. Who needs that much? the company should pay for the insurance if they are going to make a demand like that since the employees do all the driving for them like other companies

Explore other reviews about Spectrum Association Management

5.0
Sep 16, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

PTO, Culture, Management. Almost everything is a pro

Cons

Nothing. I would say MAYBE pay

1
3.0
Jan 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Competitive benefits package, including five weeks of PTO, which is generous for the industry - Overall company culture is generally positive on the surface - At the time, the Austin team was collaborative and supportive, with strong peer relationships - Client-facing leadership was capable and invested in maintaining good relationships - The role offered solid exposure to the Austin market and portfolio operations

Cons

- Significant leadership inconsistencies that negatively impacted morale, trust, and daily operations - While PTO is generous in theory, workload and expectations often made it difficult to realistically take time off - The Austin market lacked sufficient structure and operational clarity, leading to inefficiencies and unnecessary stress - Senior leadership support often felt performative rather than actionable, particularly during high-pressure periods - People management was a major weakness, with poor communication, limited accountability, and inadequate support for employees - Most concerning was how employee departures were handled. Professionalism and respect were not maintained after notice was given, creating an environment that felt uncomfortable and, at times, perceived as retaliatory - Leadership behavior during transitions undermined trust and left a lasting negative impression

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All