Solid Company - Civil Engineer Stantec Employee Review

4.0
Aug 25, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Stantec is a very large company, which means you get to interact with a lot of different people in your field and work on some massive interdisciplinary projects. Pay was above average, benefits are on par with others. I agree with the company ethics of barring political donations as leverage for work, which happens quite a bit in other companies. Work environment was better than average in my office, but I know the same could not be said across the board. There is work from home options and most of management will allow a great deal of flexibility. I think it was a great place to learn and grow my knowledge of the civil industry.

Cons

Because of the large size, there is a decent amount of bureaucracy. Also, the company has a tendency to only go after big jobs which means as an entry level or junior engineer, you can expect to do the same thing for months at a time. There is also a lack of software standards that sometimes makes for issues inside projects or when sharing between groups working on the same project. You will also be beholden to the productivity metrics, which is not a great feeling when you simultaneously have to get things done fast, yet stretch them out to have billable time.

Explore other reviews about Stantec

5.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great work environment and team

Cons

Work load can fluctuate and you may feel like you're drowning in work sometimes

1.0
Jul 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some of the projects were very interesting. Compensation and benefits were competitive.

Cons

I worked at the downtown Houston Page office (later acquired by Stantec) for one full year. During my time there, I personally witnessed significant turnover, including approximately 11 engineers and 4 Architects/Interior Designers leaving the company. I ultimately decided to resign because of what I experienced as a bullying management style. Although the former Engineering Director had been moved out of that role, he remained responsible for project deadlines. On one project, a delivery date was committed to the client without consulting me or confirming the amount of work required. I was told there would be consequences if the project was not submitted on time and that I would be responsible for damaging the client relationship, even though I had not been involved in setting the deadline. I was pressured to work six consecutive 12-hour days to meet that deadline, but based on the amount of work required, I did not believe it was realistically achievable. I ultimately submitted my two-week notice. What was especially frustrating was that I had previously sent eight Microsoft Teams messages to the new Engineering Director expressing concerns about how the project was being managed. None of those messages received a response. This was not an isolated experience. I observed similarly aggressive scheduling practices on another project, where unrealistic deadlines resulted in excessive overtime for other engineers. Based on my experience, I cannot recommend this company to professionals seeking a healthy work-life balance. While overtime was paid, the repeated expectation of long hours came at the expense of employee well-being. Ultimately, that was the primary reason I chose to leave.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All