Tech - Great work/life balance, bad tech practices - Senior Software Engineer T. Rowe Price Employee Review

3.0
May 2, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- 2 days in office policy. Relatively informal policy too but depends on the team - Well compensated for tech in asset management - 9-5:30 culture. Hardly anyone in the office after 6 - If you are in the right team you can get some good exposure to technologies

Cons

- For the team I am on, there are some seriously bad development practices. These are not opinions, they are just the basics. - Duplication everywhere, lack of thought around DRY/SOLID principals - Bad/non repeatable and unmaintainable tests - Inconsistent and bad designs and inherently dependent on batch processes. My team specifically refuse to consider event driven architectures - A lot of micromanagement and distrust between business, tech and between team leads and developers - Company has lack of real engineering mindset - Solutions often re-hashed between multiple teams - Lack of development due to lack of appreciation of above concepts. Career progression internally is purely political and not skill based

Explore other reviews about T. Rowe Price

5.0
Jul 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They are great people to work with

Cons

None I can think of

3.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Total compensation is competitive, new hires are eager to jump in, and it seems like a company strategy is finally coming together. Things continue to move slowly though because projects from the loudest voice or most tenured associates tend to get prioritized and throw off critical investments into fixing data, process, and tech debt issues to mature our ability to market like it’s 2026 instead of 2016.

Cons

Too many bottlenecks to execution; If you’re seeking to make a meaningful impact, don’t expect it fast. Expect to navigate uncertainty while the company claims to help clients do this for their portfolios instead of helping associates to help clients — This is branded fluff for leadership without clear direction, driving teams to waste too much time and energy in meetings and boring demo decks every month to make being busy look like value by being the loudest voice, which is what you’ll notice many of the most tenured associates do best. Slides might look pretty but AI doesn’t make sense of this noise and clients don’t benefit from all the hours spent in PowerPoint. Unclear ownership leads to internal redundancies or team friction, on top of the inconsistent documentation and fragmented data siloes that are ironically impeding readiness for AI mandates coming from the CEO.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All