employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Nature Conservancy

Engaged Employer

The Nature Conservancy - Preserve Manager The Nature Conservancy Employee Review

4.0
Aug 29, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Self-directed, flexible work schedule, good work-life balance, generally supportive of pursuing interests, supportive of continuing education and on-the-job training, good benefits package, co-workers are top-in-field,

Cons

Typical corporate structure and atmosphere, widely dispersed staff leaves little opportunity for working together, frequent reorganization is disruptive and confusing,

avatar
The Nature Conservancy Response
7y
Thank you for taking the time to write a review. We are happy to know you are enjoying your time at TNC and enjoy all it has to offer. Communication and connection is important to us as a global organization. TNC allows creativity, in which you can create or participate in a variety of projects and work with people outside your direct team. Thank you for your positive input!

Explore other reviews about The Nature Conservancy

5.0
Jul 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Rewarding work, amazing people, beautiful sights, lots of free food

Cons

Long hard days, sweaty, tough if you have a family.

2.0
Jul 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent benefits and access to programs, resources, and employee support that are often more comprehensive than what is available at smaller nonprofits.

Cons

There is a culture of sweeping problems under the rug to manage perceptions and avoid accountability. Many employees recognize that raising concerns about structural issues is unlikely to lead to meaningful change, which discourages people from speaking up. Managers and directors have incentives to protect their own interests rather than escalate serious problems, particularly when those issues reflect on their own leadership. In turn, senior leaders may be reluctant to address those management failures because they were responsible for hiring or promoting those managers in the first place. This creates a cycle where accountability is consistently avoided, allowing organizational dysfunction to persist. Recent restructuring decisions are a good example of these broader issues. During the North American marketing reorganization, some less qualified directors and managers were placed directly into their roles, while others were required to interview for essentially equivalent positions. Criteria such as geographic constraints were applied inconsistently across comparable roles, leaving employees with the impression that the process was neither transparent nor equitable. The resulting uncertainty and perceived unfairness have contributed to low morale, resentment, and reduced trust in leadership. Because they specialize in communications, marketing team members are especially skilled at framing or explaining away problems in ways that minimize their visibility to senior leadership, including the CMO. As a result, underlying issues often remain unaddressed until they become much larger problems.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All