employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Nature Conservancy

Engaged Employer

Flexible Organization with Strong Mission - Anonymous employee The Nature Conservancy Employee Review

5.0
May 21, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits, good compensation, flexible working conditions (in office, in the field, from home on occasion), awesome opportunities for growth, strong worldwide/national/local mission.

Cons

There are two things that I don't necessarily think are cons, but could be perceived as such: 1) Everyone wears multiple hats, and if there's a new hat, someone's trying it on to see if it will fit. So even though you have a certain title, expect to work on multiple facets of many kinds of projects in order to get them done. 2) Because of #1, every day is different. This is hard for the planner in me to wrap my brain around sometimes, but you need to have the flexibility to drop everything to work on a priority if it comes up.

avatar
The Nature Conservancy Response
8y
Thank you for taking the time to write a review. We are happy to know you are enjoying your time here and all that The Nature Conservancy has to offer. We are passionate about our mission and there is never a dull moment in the work we do. Thank you for your continuous work and support!

Explore other reviews about The Nature Conservancy

5.0
Jul 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Rewarding work, amazing people, beautiful sights, lots of free food

Cons

Long hard days, sweaty, tough if you have a family.

2.0
Jul 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent benefits and access to programs, resources, and employee support that are often more comprehensive than what is available at smaller nonprofits.

Cons

There is a culture of sweeping problems under the rug to manage perceptions and avoid accountability. Many employees recognize that raising concerns about structural issues is unlikely to lead to meaningful change, which discourages people from speaking up. Managers and directors have incentives to protect their own interests rather than escalate serious problems, particularly when those issues reflect on their own leadership. In turn, senior leaders may be reluctant to address those management failures because they were responsible for hiring or promoting those managers in the first place. This creates a cycle where accountability is consistently avoided, allowing organizational dysfunction to persist. Recent restructuring decisions are a good example of these broader issues. During the North American marketing reorganization, some less qualified directors and managers were placed directly into their roles, while others were required to interview for essentially equivalent positions. Criteria such as geographic constraints were applied inconsistently across comparable roles, leaving employees with the impression that the process was neither transparent nor equitable. The resulting uncertainty and perceived unfairness have contributed to low morale, resentment, and reduced trust in leadership. Because they specialize in communications, marketing team members are especially skilled at framing or explaining away problems in ways that minimize their visibility to senior leadership, including the CMO. As a result, underlying issues often remain unaddressed until they become much larger problems.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All