employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Nature Conservancy

Engaged Employer

Strong mission, wonderful people - Associate Director of Development The Nature Conservancy Employee Review

5.0
Jul 15, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have the opportunity to work with some of the smartest, nicest people every day. The scientists are doing true cutting edge work in programs that mean a great deal to the community. The benefits are really good, from medical/dental to holidays and PTO. That I also get to spend time in some of our preserves is icing on the cake because they are some of the most beautiful spots in the country.

Cons

There is a lot to learn and there is an abundance of information and policies, but not really an easy way to figure out what to do. However, every time a step is missed, people are very kind in how they get back to you. The corporate leadership all resigned shortly after I started, but the way they filled the gaps for the interim was very solid.

avatar
The Nature Conservancy Response
6y
Thank you for taking the time to write a review. We are happy to know that you are surrounded by passionate colleagues while doing meaningful work! It's great to hear that you have visited some of our preserves, being able to see the work we do out in the field is truly a treat. We appreciate your feedback and wish you a successful career.

Explore other reviews about The Nature Conservancy

5.0
Jul 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Rewarding work, amazing people, beautiful sights, lots of free food

Cons

Long hard days, sweaty, tough if you have a family.

2.0
Jul 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent benefits and access to programs, resources, and employee support that are often more comprehensive than what is available at smaller nonprofits.

Cons

There is a culture of sweeping problems under the rug to manage perceptions and avoid accountability. Many employees recognize that raising concerns about structural issues is unlikely to lead to meaningful change, which discourages people from speaking up. Managers and directors have incentives to protect their own interests rather than escalate serious problems, particularly when those issues reflect on their own leadership. In turn, senior leaders may be reluctant to address those management failures because they were responsible for hiring or promoting those managers in the first place. This creates a cycle where accountability is consistently avoided, allowing organizational dysfunction to persist. Recent restructuring decisions are a good example of these broader issues. During the North American marketing reorganization, some less qualified directors and managers were placed directly into their roles, while others were required to interview for essentially equivalent positions. Criteria such as geographic constraints were applied inconsistently across comparable roles, leaving employees with the impression that the process was neither transparent nor equitable. The resulting uncertainty and perceived unfairness have contributed to low morale, resentment, and reduced trust in leadership. Because they specialize in communications, marketing team members are especially skilled at framing or explaining away problems in ways that minimize their visibility to senior leadership, including the CMO. As a result, underlying issues often remain unaddressed until they become much larger problems.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All