employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Tutor Perini Corporation

Engaged Employer

Looking for lots of cash or a place to hide? This could be your place! - Field Engineer Tutor Perini Corporation Employee Review

1.0
Mar 6, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Salaries 20% higher than industry average. Opportunity to become an invisible cog within the machine for many years. Lots of good people working within to celebrate your shared misery with. Good launching platform for many.

Cons

A massive corporation that is run by a dictatorial madman who is extremely derogatory towards those who work for him. Company credo = everyone has a price. Loyalty to the supreme leader and his inner circle is valued above all other professional qualities. The infamous CEO and his loyalist operating this $4 billion dollar company create a truly toxic work environment that is pervasive throughout the company. The poor values instilled in high level managers solidifies their inability/unwillingness to eliminate those who are incompetent at their jobs. The amount of inefficiency, waste, and fraudulent activity within the company is truly amazing. Tutor is a corporate welfare operation first, a business second, and down the list a construction company.

Explore other reviews about Tutor Perini Corporation

5.0
Mar 3, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice people, Know how to build working as team and support individual

Cons

didn't have clear vision to future jobs in New York

1
1.0
Mar 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nothing that I can think of

Cons

The working conditions on the HART project are extremely unhealthy and feel deliberately unsustainable. Long and exhausting days—often exceeding 11 hours—are treated as standard, and Saturday work is expected without question. There are no true holidays, only two floating days for the entire year, making work‑life balance nearly impossible. Leadership is disorganized, unresponsive, and difficult to work with. Instead of providing guidance, new employees are left to navigate everything on their own. When questions arise, the default response is to “search the cloud” or “read the plans,” even when the information is outdated, incomplete, or nearly impossible to locate. This creates a culture where employees are set up to fail from the start. Work is assigned with urgency, yet reviews are delayed for days or even weeks. After completing tasks without timely feedback, employees often receive pages of comments requiring major revisions—revisions that could have been avoided had leadership reviewed the work earlier or answered questions when asked. This cycle repeats constantly and erodes morale. Engineers are expected to use AutoCAD, but the computers provided cannot run the software effectively, resulting in frequent delays and unnecessary frustration. The offboarding process is equally unprofessional. Even when employees submit a proper two‑week notice, management may instruct them to leave earlier than their stated end date. Accrued PTO and sick leave are not paid out or handled transparently, leaving departing employees feeling dismissed and disrespected. Overall, the environment is stressful, chaotic, and deeply discouraging. Employees are treated as replaceable rather than valued. Anyone considering this project should be fully aware of how damaging the experience can be.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All