Considering all the elements - Clinician II Two Chairs Employee Review

3.0
Apr 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

As mental health companies go, they pay a fair salary. Any salary increases are largely based on merit (performance) which in my experience depends on who your manager is.

Cons

The frequency of evolving requirements and training protocols for clinicians is substantial, with modifications occurring approximately every one to two months, introducing new elements or discontinuing established practices. Throughout my tenure, the pressure on clinicians to achieve high performance metrics has significantly increased without a commensurate rise in compensation. Scheduled session durations have been extended from 50 minutes to 55 minutes, frequently allowing only one to two minutes for preparation between clients. The company exhibits a disproportionately high number of non-income-producing, highly compensated employees in contrast to the low compensation provided to income-producing clinicians. Google sources estimate Two Chairs’ ratio to be between 20-30%, considerably exceeding the mental health industry standard of approximately 8-10%. The operational burden is consistently and heavily placed upon the clinicians, rather than assessing and implementing reductions in non-income-producing positions, or, at a minimum, ceasing the expansion of such roles within the organization. Two Chairs functions primarily as a technology company seeking profitability within the mental health sector, rather than a mental health provider prioritizing clinical expertise. The organization has developed numerous platforms for data input that often bypass the consideration of the clinician's professional judgment. A substantial amount of work now involves checking boxes, completing mandatory trainings, and adhering to new, “improved,” or revised protocols, often without soliciting adequate clinical input before the implementation of these peripheral components. Furthermore, research findings are employed in a potentially biased manner to support existing initiatives, rather than through an impartial review encompassing all research outcomes.

avatar
Two Chairs Response
3mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We hear your concerns about the pace of changes and their impact on clinicians’ time and workload. We’re always working to create greater consistency and balance. While these updates are intended to improve care quality, we recognize they can feel disruptive. We also want to emphasize that we actively seek and incorporate clinician feedback into company-wide decisions that impact the clinician experience. If you'd like to share more thoughts, we encourage you to bring them to your HR Business Partner and/or clinical manager.

Explore other reviews about Two Chairs

3.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Responsive, supportive managers/direct report; intentional training; Flexible scheduling

Cons

Pay structure change plus very slow client referrals the past 6+ months have resulted in significant negative financial impact. Emphasis on positives is disproportionate and doesn't accurately reflect reality. (See advice for management). Currently gearing up for new workflows, and there added responsibility: It appears that clinicians will be doing some work that 2 teams (one clinical, one administrative) have previously managed.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All